文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：“场域-惯习”视角下我国社会工作者的实践策略分析

英文题名：The Practical Strategy Analysis of China Social Workers from the Perspective of“Field-Habitus”

作者：洪佩[1];费梅苹[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会工作系,上海200237

年份：2015

卷号：30

期号：6

起止页码：21

中文期刊名：华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI2014_2016】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：社会工作专业实践;专业实践场域;专业惯习;专业实践策略

外文关键词：social work practice; professional practice field; professional habitus; professional practicestrategies

摘要：根据布迪厄的社会实践理论,行动者会根据其在场域中所处的位置依靠自身的惯习而作出相应的策略选择;在此理论思想的指导下,对我国社会工作者的专业实践场域与专业惯习进行了分析,并进一步探讨了社会工作者不同的专业实践策略。研究表明,在我国社会工作专业发展的当前阶段,社会工作者在场域中的位置和所拥有的资本某种程度上而言是既定的,其实践策略的差异性主要在于专业惯习之间的区别。具体而言,根据社会工作者在特定的专业实践场域中主体性意识的强弱和理论知识积累的多寡,其专业实践策略可以分为自主反思的实践策略、迂回顺从的实践策略、被动妥协的实践策略以及经验主导的实践策略。
According to Bourdieu＇s theory of social practice, people make the relative choices according to the position they locate in the field and their own habitus. Guided by this theory, we analyze the social workers＇ professional practice field and habitus, and explored their different practice strategies further. Study shows, at the current social work development situation in China, the position of social workers and the resources they have are fixed in some certain degree, and the differences of practical strategies are mainly about their practical habitus. Based on the strength of social workers＇ subjective consciousness in a certain professional practice field and the amount of their theory knowledge, we discover that their practice strategies could be mainly divided into four types：self-reflection, circuitous obedience, passive compromise and experiential leading.