文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：一流智库学术影响力评价指数及实证研究

英文题名：The Evaluation Index and Empirical Study of First-rate Think Tank Academic Influence

作者：周霜菊[1];任福兵[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学科技信息研究所,上海200237

年份：2018

卷号：39

期号：5

起止页码：89

中文期刊名：情报资料工作

外文期刊名：Information and Documentation Services

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2017_2018】；

基金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金项目"上海高端智库决策影响力提升路径研究"(编号:WR1624001)的研究成果之一

语种：中文

中文关键词：一流智库;学术影响力;评价指数;实证研究

外文关键词：first-rate think tank;academic influence;evaluation index;empirical research

摘要：文章构建了基于发文量、被引量、被下载量和基金支持量4个影响因子的智库学术影响力指数评价公式,并以上海社会科学院发布的《2016年中国智库报告》中排名前30的智库作为研究对象,通过CKNI获取2016年上述智库的相关数据,进行学术影响力指数的实证研究。研究表明,国内一流智库的学术影响力和综合影响力排名具有较高的一致性,学术影响力与被引量和被下载呈正相关,官方智库相对来说更依赖于体制内资源,高校智库总体则更注重学术影响力。
The paper constructs a formula for evaluating the academic influence index of think-tank based on the number of published paper, cited amount, downloaded amount and amount of supporting funds, and compares the top30 think-tank from 2016 China Think-tank Report by the Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences. After that it obtains the data in 2016 through CKNI database and studies the academic influence index of above think-tanks empirically.The result shows that academic influence ranking and the comprehensive influence ranking of Chinese top think-tanks has high consistency and academic influence has present positive correlation with amounts of download and citation. In the meantime, government think-tanks depend on government resources more relatively and college think-tanks usually pay more attention to academic influence.