文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：关于代位权行使效果归属问题的探讨

英文题名：A discussion on the ascription of exercising effect of subrogation

作者：任虎[1];曹俊金[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学法学院,上海200237

年份：2007

卷号：22

期号：2

起止页码：93

中文期刊名：华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

语种：中文

中文关键词：代位权;行使效果;效果归属;入库原则;直接受偿;优先受偿

外文关键词：subrogation; exercising effect; ascription of effect; rule of warehousing; direct-discharge; priority to gain compensation

摘要：债权人代位权行使效果归属有入库原则和直接受偿两种学说。代位权是一种实体性权利,它在我国的确立有其特殊的基础,其设立的目的并不在于保护所有债权人的一般债权。本文从代位权的行使范围、比较法学、诉讼经济、行使代位权可能产生的社会效果、对债务人处分权利的限制以及债权平等多个视角对两种学说进行考量,力证直接受偿原则优于入库原则。
There are two theories on subrogation, rule of warehousing and direct-discharge. Subrogation is a kind of substantive right, it is established on special basis, and the purpose of it is not to protect all the creditors＇rights. This article from the exercising area of subrogation, comparative law, litigation economy, the social effect of subrogation exercising, the restriction on the debtor＇s right and equality of creditor＇s right, proves that the direct-discharge is more excellent than the rule of warehousing through nine different angles of view.