文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：碳排放权交易能否助力实现“双碳”目标?——来自能源供给侧与消费侧的异质性证据

英文题名：Whether Carbon Emission Permit Trade Contributes to Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality: The Heterogenous Evidence of the Energy Supply and Consumption Sides

作者：邵帅[1];徐乐[2];章绍一[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学商学院,上海200237;[2]上海财经大学自由贸易区研究院,上海200433

年份：2022

卷号：50

期号：4

起止页码：27

中文期刊名：兰州大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;社科基金资助期刊;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2021_2022】；

基金：国家社会科学基金重大项目(21ZDA084);中国博士后科学基金第13批特别资助(站中)项目(2020T130397);上海市“科技创新行动计划”软科学项目(22692103400)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：碳排放权交易;碳减排;能源供给侧;能源消费侧;双重差分模型

外文关键词：carbon emission permit trade;carbon emission reduction;energy supply side;energy consumption side;difference-in-difference(DID)model

摘要：碳排放权交易作为纠正碳排放负外部性的有效手段,被预期为我国实现“碳达峰、碳中和”(“双碳”)目标的重要政策工具,但现有研究对于碳排放权交易试点政策在具有不同能源禀赋地区的实施效果是否存在差异尚未予以关注。采用2003-2017年中国280座地级及以上城市的面板数据样本和双重差分(DID)模型,在区分碳排放权交易试点政策的价格效应与规模效应的基础上,对该政策的碳减排效应及其作用机制进行了实证考察。特别地,识别比较了该政策在能源供给侧与消费侧的异质性实施效果。研究发现,碳排放权交易试点政策能够产生显著的碳减排效应,而且这种减排效应在能源供给侧要明显强于能源消费侧;碳排放权交易试点政策的价格效应对碳减排的推动作用在样本城市整体层面显著存在,而其规模效应对碳减排的积极影响则仅在非直辖市和非低碳试点城市显著存在;产业结构优化仅能在能源供给侧通过碳排放权交易试点政策的价格效应驱动碳减排,而绿色技术创新无论在能源供给侧还是消费侧,均有助于实现碳排放权交易试点政策的碳减排效应。
As an effective method of correcting the negative externalities of carbon emission, the carbon emission permit trade is anticipated to be a major policy tool for carbon peaking and carbon neutrality. However,the existing researches do not focus on the difference of the actual effect in the regions of various energy endowments where the pilot policy of carbon emission permit trade is implemented. By adopting the panel data of 280 cities at prefecture level and above in China from 2003 to 2017 and the difference-in-difference(DID)model, and distinguishing the price effect and scale effect of the pilot policy, the present paper conducts an empirical study on the carbon emission reduction effect and mechanism of the pilot policy. Moreover, it compares the heterogenous effect of the energy supply side and energy consumption side owing to the exercise of the pilot policy. The results show that the pilot policy can generate a remarkable carbon emission reduction effect, which is more obvious in the energy supply side than the consumption side. The price effect of the pilot policy has significantly propelled carbon emission reduction in the sample cities as a whole, while the positive impact of the scale effect on carbon emission reduction is apparent only in non-municipalities and non-low-carbon pilot cities. Besides, the industrial structure optimization can only advance carbon emission reduction on the energy supply side through the price effect of the pilot policy. However, the green technology innovation can facilitate the pilot policy to achieve the same effect on both sides of energy supply and consumption.