文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：The Development of the Psychological Monitors' Burnout Scale in College

作者：Zhan, Qisheng[1,2];Song, Fanglin[1,2];Liu, Xinyi[1,2];Li, Yonghui[3];Li, Shanji[4];Li, Jia[5];Wang, Zheng[6];Liu, Jingjing[7];Zhou, Min[8];Liu, Shiyong[9];Liu, Hui[10]

机构：[1]Tianjin Univ, Inst Psychol, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China;[2]Tianjin Univ, Sch Educ, Tianjin 300350, Peoples R China;[3]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Psychol Counseling Ctr, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China;[4]Yanbian Univ, Mental Hlth Educ & Counseling Ctr, Yanji 133000, Peoples R China;[5]Northwest Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Xian 710069, Peoples R China;[6]North China Elect Power Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Beijing 102206, Peoples R China;[7]Xinjiang Normal Univ, Mental Hlth Educ & Serv Ctr, Urumqi 830017, Peoples R China;[8]Yangzhou Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Yangzhou 225009, Peoples R China;[9]Fuyang Normal Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Fuyang 236037, Peoples R China;[10]Peking Univ, Student Counseling & Mental Hlth Ctr, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China

年份：2026

卷号：16

期号：7

外文期刊名：BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES

收录：;Scopus(收录号：2-s2.0-105045706259);WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:001832308400001)】；

基金：This research was funded by the "Construction of the National College Psychological Monitors' Work Network" project under the "Project for Building a World-Class Chinese Psychological Association with Chinese Characteristics" of the Chinese Psychological Society, grant number 2023YLXH-XLWY02.

语种：英文

外文关键词：psychological monitors; burnout; development of scale; validity; reliability

摘要：The aim of this study was to develop the Psychological Monitor's Burnout Scale in College (PMBSC) and test its validity and reliability. Based on literature analysis, open-ended questionnaire surveys and interviews, the construct of PMBSC was defined and the preliminary scale was compiled in this study. In total, 530 psychological monitors were selected for item analysis and exploratory factor analysis; another 859 were selected for confirmatory factor analysis, split-half reliability and internal consistency reliability tests, of which 172 were retested after 5 weeks. The Competency Questionnaire for Psychological Monitors in College (CQPMC) and Chinese Perceived Stress Scale (CPSS) were used to test the criterion validity. The PMBSC contained 20 items and was composed of three factors that accounted for 64.71% of the variance. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the three-factor structure model fitted well (chi(2)/df = 5.53, RMSEA = 0.073, CFI = 0.938, NFI = 0.926, RFI = 0.916, IFI = 0.938, TLI = 0.930, GFI = 0.899). The criterion validity test showed that the total scores and factor scores of PMBSC were negatively correlated with the total scores of CQPMC (r = -0.54--0.65, p < 0.01), while they were positively correlated with the total scores of CPSS (r = 0.39-0.48, p < 0.01). The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the total scale and its three factors ranged from 0.88 to 0.95, the split-half reliability ranged from 0.88 to 0.94, and the test-retest reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.85. The Psychological Monitor's Burnout Scale in College has good validity and reliability. The PMBSC provides targeted measurement tools for college psychological monitors and verifies the adaptability of Maslach's three-dimensional burnout model among student peer helpers theoretically. Practically, the scale supports regular burnout screening and precise mental health intervention for psychological monitor teams in universities.