详细信息

导向浮阀塔板和F1型浮阀塔板的比较    

Comparison of Directed Valve Trays and F 1 type Valve Trays

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:导向浮阀塔板和F1型浮阀塔板的比较

英文题名:Comparison of Directed Valve Trays and F 1 type Valve Trays

作者:李玉安[1];路秀林[1];赵培[1]

机构:[1]华东理工大学化学工程系

年份:1996

卷号:25

期号:8

起止页码:563

中文期刊名:石油化工

外文期刊名:Petrochemical Technology

收录:CSTPCD;;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心1992】;CSCD:【CSCD2011_2012】;

语种:中文

中文关键词:浮阀塔板;压降;雾沫夹带;泄漏;板效率;化工设备

外文关键词:valve trays,pressure drop,entrainment,weeping,plate efficiency

摘要:应用空气-水系统,在1600×400mm的矩形塔内,对导向浮阀塔板和F1型浮阀塔板的流体力学进行了试验研究,测定了塔板压降、雾沫夹带和泄漏。应用空气-水-CO2系统,测定了导向浮阀塔板和F1型浮阀塔板的效率。试验结果和工业应用表明。
The hydrodynamics of directed valve trays and F 1 type valve trays are experimentally studied with the air water system in a 1600×400 rectangular column The pressure drop,entrainment and weeping have been measured The plate efficiency of the directed valve tray and F 1 type valve trays based on the desorption of CO 2 has been determined using the air water CO 2 system The experimental results and industrial uses show that the characteristics of directed valve trays are evidently better than that of the F 1 type valve trays in hydrodynamics and mass transfer

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©华东理工大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-7 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心