详细信息

Determinant on RFID technology investment for dominant retailer subject to inventory misplacement  ( SCI-EXPANDED收录 EI收录)  

文献类型:期刊文献

英文题名:Determinant on RFID technology investment for dominant retailer subject to inventory misplacement

作者:Tao, Feng[1,2];Lai, Kinkeung[3,4];Wang, Yao-Yu[5];Fan, Tijun[1,2]

机构:[1]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Management Sci & Engn, Shanghai, Peoples R China;[2]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Res Ctr Virtual Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China;[3]Shaanxi Normal Univ, Int Business Sch, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;[4]Xidian Univ, Coll Management, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China;[5]Soochow Univ, Dongwu Business Sch, Suzhou 215021, Jiangsu, Peoples R China

年份:2020

卷号:27

期号:2

起止页码:1058

外文期刊名:INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTIONS IN OPERATIONAL RESEARCH

收录:;EI(收录号:20194307566777);WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:000490364500014),SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000490364500014)】;

语种:英文

外文关键词:game theory; inventory theory; optimization; supply chain management

摘要:Radio-frequency identification (RFID) technology has been publicized as an effective way to solve the problem of inventory misplacement in academic research as well as in the user industries. In this paper, we consider a supply chain that consists of one supplier and one retailer where the retailer is the Stackelberg leader and makes the decisions first. The consignment contract is provided such that the supplier determines the order quantity, instead of the retailer. A Non-RFID case, a supplier investing in RFID, and a retailer investing in RFID cases are analyzed and compared. By assuming an iso-elastic demand function and the corresponding random factor follows uniform distribution, it is intriguing to find that both supplier and retailer have the incentive to take charge of the RFID tag cost, which is not revealed in previous research. Therefore, a case of joint investment in RFID technology is formulated to find out that there are upper and lower threshold values of RFID tag cost sharing rate; that is, if the tag cost sharing rate exceeds the upper value, it is beneficial for the supplier to invest in RFID; if the tag cost sharing rate is smaller than the lower value, it is beneficial for the retailer to invest in RFID; if the tag cost sharing rate is somewhere between these two values, both supplier and retailer are better-off. Additionally, the end customer will be better-off if the retailer invests in RFID.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©华东理工大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-7 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心