文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：司法公开制度实践及其完善——基于南京“彭宇案”而展开的研究

英文题名：The Practice of Judicial Public System and Improvement——Based on the Research of Nanjing “Pengyu Case”

作者：李瑜青[1];博雅文[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学法学院,上海200237

年份：2017

卷号：19

期号：1

起止页码：31

中文期刊名：哈尔滨工业大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2017_2018】；

基金：中国法学会(部级)2013年重大研究项目"法律实施的保障机制研究"(CLS2013A04);2016年中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"法律制度实施效果评估体系研究"(WT1621001)

语种：中文

中文关键词：彭宇案;法院;司法公开制度;交互性司法公开模式;信息发布机制;舆论回应机制

外文关键词：Pengyu Case; court; the judicial public system; interactive judicial public model; information release mechanism; response mechanism of public opinion;

摘要：法院司法公开制度建设所取得的成绩令人鼓舞,但在实践中仍然有值得深入研究的问题,其中突出的是司法公开制度建设上仍然存在的封闭性、单向性等现象,使得在现实司法实践过程中,所谓司法公开制度却不能有效构建起对外部信息或舆论的回应,这直接影响了民众对司法公信力的期盼。运用法律社会学方法,以具有典型意义的彭宇案为切入点进行分析研究,展现了彭宇案中当事人、媒体和公众以及法院的行动特征。法院判决没有错误,但在媒体的持续发酵中却不作回应,这与法院司法公开制度不完善密切相关。应建立法院与媒体合理对话的司法公开机制,加强司法公开机制的法治保障,构建包含信息发布机制和舆论回应机制等内容的交互性模式的制度系统,以完善法院司法公开制度。
The author believes that judicial public system construction achievements are inspiring,but in practice there are still issues worthy of further study. One prominent problem is there still exist the phenomena such as closure and one-way in the public construction of judicial system,which made in real judicial practice process,the so-called judicial public system unable to effectively build up response to external information or opinion,which directly affects the public anticipation of judicial credibility. By applying the method of sociology of law to ＂Pengyu Case＂with typical significance as the breakthrough point analysis,this paper attempts to show the characteristics of actions of the parties concerned as well as the media,the public and the court. In the ＂Pengyu Case＂,there was no error in the court ruling. But confronted with the continuous fermentation in the media,there was no response. It is closely related to the the fact that the court judicial public system is not complete. It is urgent to establish a reasonable dialogue mechanism between the court and media,strengthen the judicial guarantee of the public system,build interactive mode system containing contents such as information release mechanism and the response mechanism of public opinion,to perfect the judicial public system.