文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：分隔与扩散:结构洞理论视角下我国社会工作高证据等级研究

英文题名：Current Status and Development Path Prospect of Social Work High-Evidence-Level Research in China's Mainland from the Perspective of Structural Hole Theory

作者：孙希希[1];段文杰[1];王子川[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院,上海200237

年份：2023

期号：6

起止页码：82

中文期刊名：社会工作

外文期刊名：Journal of Social Work

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2023_2024】；

基金：上海市2023年度“科技创新行动计划”自然科学基金立项课题“突发危机应激障碍群体轨迹建模与随机对照靶向干预试验”(项目编号:23ZR1415000)的阶段性成果。

语种：中文

中文关键词：社会工作学科建设;结构洞;系统综述;随机对照试验;文献计量分析

摘要：社会工作高证据等级研究对社会工作学科的高质量发展具有重要意义。本研究依托结构洞理论,使用文献计量法对比了国际学者和我国内地学者在高证据等级社会工作研究的生产特点。在Web of Science数据库中,检索2006年10月11日至2023年3月31日期间发表在SSCI社会工作类别44个期刊上的论文,最终纳入2067篇高证据等级社会工作研究文献进行文献计量分析。研究发现,国际学者文献发表增速快,期刊覆盖全,研究领域广泛并逐渐深入细分领域;而我国内地学者发表的高证据等级研究平稳起步,研究聚类边界分明,研究主题间存在结构洞,针对儿童群体的研究热点逐渐显现。在未来,应积极鼓励不同证据分级的高质量社会工作研究快速生产和积累,为高证据等级研究奠定坚实基础;同时我国社会工作学者应基于本土经验,打造易为国际社会所理解和接受的新概念、新范畴、新表述,引导国际学术界展开研究和讨论,发挥结构洞的位置优势,扩展研究主题和研究群体,营造社会工作高质量发展的知识生态和社会生态。
Introduction:It is of great significance to promote the high-quality development of social work in China by actively introducing the experience of international social work in implementing high-evidencelevel research.It is undeniable that the development of the discipline of social work worldwide has now moved towards the dominance of the evidence-based practice paradigm.Scientific evidence is one of the core elements of the evidence-based practice paradigm.Given that strong evidence level studies usually utilize more advanced research methods,the findings are more scientific and can provide more scientific guidance for practice.In order to respond to the“development and construction of the new liberal arts”,China’s social work discipline should develop innovative competitiveness and international competitiveness.Therefore,it is necessary to understand the characteristics of the development of high-evidence-level research in social work both internationally and in China's Mainland.The structural hole theory would be an important theory in this study to explain the development and diffusion of social work evidence.Methods:Relying on the structural hole theory,this study used the bibliometric analysis to compare the developmental characteristics of high-evidence-level social work research from international scholars and scholars from the Chinese mainland.In this study,44 journals of SSCI Social Work Classification were searched in Web of Science database from October 11,2006 to March 31,2023.Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were followed.Finally,2010 high-evidence-level social work research literatures published by international social work researchers and 57 literature written by mainland Chinese social work researchers were included.Keyword co-occurrence analysis and burst term detection were conducted by using VOSviewer and CiteSpace.Results:The depth and breadth of high-evidence-level research published by international scholars is superior to that of mainland Chinese scholars,but the potential for high-evidence-level research in China's Mainland is greater.Specifically,for high-evidence-level research published by international scholars,it is found that the number of studies grew faster,with a better journal coverage.Research topics cover a wider range of research areas and research groups,such as maltreatment,healthcare,perpetration,mental illness across children,older person,females and males.The four main clusters,with a high density,extended many subfields and the core content have a wide coverage of research topics.Research areas intertwined with no obvious gap areas,showing that the phenomenon of structural holes is not obvious.Burst term detection showed that the heated period of about one fourth burst terms were more than five years.International scholars’attention to research in the field of childhood had gradually shifted to more specialized areas.However,it seems that research hotspots tend to be cooling off.Comparatively,for highevidence-level research published by mainland Chinese scholars,it has a later but a smooth start.Even though the number of studies was much less than that of international scholars,clear boundaries of the research clusters can be noticed.The research focus was concentrated in the areas of child abuse and children’s problematic behaviors.The coverage of the subdivided research spreading out from the main research clusters is still relatively narrow.Structural holes can thus be located between the research topics.Research hotspots targeting the children’s population have gradually appeared in the past few years.After categorizing the burst terms,it can be found that scholars in China's Mainland pay attention to the research methodology,including terms such as control group,intervention group,effect size,confidence interval,ratio and so on.Recommendations:It is noticeable that research focus of high-evidence-level research from both international social work researchers and mainland Chinese researchers was on children.The number of systematic review studies published by social work scholars accounted for about four-fifths of the highevidence-level research.This reflects that the recognition and acceptance of social work academics for high-evidence-level research,especially systematic reviews.At the same time,to a certain extent,this proves the greater difficulty of conducting rigorous randomized controlled trials in the field of social work.In the future,social work in China should actively encourage the rapid production and accumulation of high-quality social work research evidence on different evidence hierarchy,in order to lay a solid foundation for high-evidence-level research.At the same time,considering the structure holes between research topics,scholars from Chinese mainland should have an international perspective,fully incorporate the local experience,expand the field of research,apply multidisciplinary theories and techniques,in order to submit a Chinese answer for the development of social work research and disciplines through the medium of the SSCI journals of social work,and to spread the voice of China.