详细信息
基于元分析的农户认知对宅基地退出意愿的影响研究
The Effects of Farmers’ Cognition on Rural Residential Land Withdrawal Intention Based on Meta-analysis
文献类型:期刊文献
中文题名:基于元分析的农户认知对宅基地退出意愿的影响研究
英文题名:The Effects of Farmers’ Cognition on Rural Residential Land Withdrawal Intention Based on Meta-analysis
作者:俞振宁[1];邱纪东[1];夏楚瑜[2,3]
机构:[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院,上海200237;[2]北京工业大学城市建设学部,北京100124;[3]自然资源部海洋空间资源管理技术重点实验室,浙江杭州310012
年份:2023
卷号:37
期号:1
起止页码:80
中文期刊名:中国土地科学
外文期刊名:China Land Science
收录:CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2020】;CSSCI:【CSSCI2023_2024】;CSCD:【CSCD2023_2024】;
基金:上海市哲学社会科学规划课题(2021ZGL003)。
语种:中文
中文关键词:农户认知;宅基地退出;退出意愿;元分析
外文关键词:farmers’cognition;rural residential land withdrawal;withdrawal intention;meta-analysis
摘要:研究目的:梳理农户宅基地退出意愿实证研究,基于农户认知角度对影响因素进行综合性检验,促进宅基地退出政策完善和研究发展。研究方法:元分析(Meta-analysis)。研究结果:基于38篇文献、115个效应值、21 559个农户样本,农户宅基地退出意愿主要受到行为态度、主观规范、知觉控制行为、政策可信度、服务评价、市民化感知和所有权认知的正向影响,同时受到风险预期和祖业观的负向影响;在影响程度方面,行为态度、知觉控制行为、政策可信度相对较强,市民化感知较弱;不同经济发展水平地区影响程度存在差异,欠发达地区的知觉控制行为、政策可信度和所有权认知的影响比发达地区强,而服务评价影响相对较弱。研究结论:建立宅基地退出政策设计、执行、评估、宣传及配套保障的完善流程和分类治理体系;探索多种方式促进宅基地改革与农户祖业观等非正式制度的融合;欠发达地区需更重视农户的资源禀赋状况和宅基地认知水平,发达地区要更注重提升政策执行水平;更多视角的影响因素和异质性来源探索是未来研究重点方向。
The purposes of this study are to summarize the research progress on rural residential land withdrawal, and to comprehensively examine the effect of farmers’ cognition on the intention. The research method of meta-analysis is employed. The results show that farmers’ rural residential land withdrawal intention is mainly positively affected by behavioral attitude, subjective norm, perceived control behavior, policy credibility, service evaluation, perception of citizenization and ownership cognition, and negatively affected by risk expectation and view of ancestry based on 38literatures, 115 effect values and 21 559 samples. In terms of the degrees of influence, behavioral attitude, perceived control behavior and policy credibility are relatively strong, while the perception of citizenization is weak. And the effects of perceived control behavior, policy credibility and ownership perception in developing areas are stronger than those in developed areas, while the effect of service evaluation is weaker. In conclusion, the classified management system of policy design, implementation, evaluation, publicity and supporting guarantee of rural residential land withdrawal need to be improved. And the methods to promote the integration of rural residential land reform and informal institutions need to be further explored. Developing regions need to pay more attention to improving the resource endowment of farmers and knowledge level of rural residential land, and developed regions need to pay more attention to improving the level of policy implementation. Future studies need to explore the influencing factors and heterogeneity from more perspectives.
参考文献:
正在载入数据...
