文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：跨区域经营监管与银行流动性调整

英文题名：Supervision on Cross-regional Operations and Bank Liquidity Adjustment

作者：麦勇[1];蒋雪[1];蒋宇翔[1,2]

机构：[1]华东理工大学商学院,上海200237;[2]银河基金,上海200122

年份：2021

卷号：47

期号：8

起止页码：155

中文期刊名：财经研究

外文期刊名：Journal of Finance and Economics

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;社科基金资助期刊;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2021_2022】；

基金：国家社会科学基金项目(20FJYB057)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：银行流动性;调整速度;放松管制;净稳定资金比率

外文关键词：bank liquidity;adjustment speed;deregulation;Basel III Net Stable Funding Ratio

摘要：跨区域经营监管放松后我国的中小银行能主动调整流动性以应对经营风险吗?当前我国的中小银行面对的宏观经济条件和经营环境与20世纪90年代美国各州银行有诸多相似之处。为此,文章利用20世纪90年代美国出台的IBBEA法案作为准自然实验进行实证研究,探究银行是否会主动调整流动性以应对跨区域经营监管政策的放松。结果表明:(1)当跨区域经营监管放松时,美国各州的银行会主动调整流动性;且这个现象在经济条件较差的地区以及流动性风险应对能力强、网点规模大的银行中更显著。(2)调整速度慢的银行会逃离监管放松地区,且逃走后不会提高流动性调整速度。根据上述结论,结合我国地方中小银行流动性监管的实际情况,文章建议监管机构有选择且渐进地放松跨区域监管,优先从经济强、人口多、息差高的地区实施监管放松;同时,还可以选择在网点多和规模较大的中小银行所在地区实施监管放松。
China has been implementing the reform of interest rate liberalization,which is vital for bank industry.However,the economic growth overall has slowed down and there is considerable economic imbalance between different regions within China.How to relax the cross-regional operations of local banks without causing liquidity issues becomes an important and imminent research topic for both banks and regulators.Regulators have attempted to accommodate policies for cross-regional operations.But at present,most regional banks are still restricted to operate within local area.After the deregulation of cross-regional operations,can the local banks adjust their liquidity in a timely manner to cope with the risks brought by environmental changes?The existing literature is not clear about the relationship between the cross-regional operation supervision and liquidity adjustment in Chinese local banks.The Interstate Banking and Branching Efficiency Act(IBBEA)provides a basis for the study of this issue,which was promulgated by the United States in 1994.On the one hand,the macroenvironment between China and the 1990 s’US shares many similarities.For example,both nations have been experiencing a transitory phase showing a decelerated economic growth,have just completed the interest rate liberalization,and have been facing regional economic imbalance issues.On the other hand,the implementation of the IBBEA serves as a quasi-natural experiment,which effectively solves the endogeneity problem.In these respects,this article discusses the benefit function of different liquidity adjustment strategies and examines the implementation effect of the IBBEA on bank liquidity adjustment.The results show that:When the cross-regional operation supervision is relaxed,banks in the focal states will actively adjust liquidity;and this phenomenon is more pronounced in regions with poorer economic conditions and banks with stronger liquidity manipulation skills and larger branches.We find that banks with slow adjustment speed would escape from the deregulated areas and would not increase liquidity adjustment speed afterwards.Considering the current situation of liquidity supervision of local banks in China,we recommend that authorities selectively relax cross-regional supervision.Regulators can prioritize deregulation in areas with robust economic conditions,large population,and high interest margin.Meanwhile,areas with sufficient amount of bank branches or great bank asset base could also be selected for deregulation.There are three contributions in this article:First,it establishes a model from the micro perspective of local bank operations,analyzes banks’optimal liquidity adjustment strategy when cross-regional operating policies are changed,and explores the behavior of bank liquidity adjustment.Second,it explains how regional differences and bank heterogeneity affect the speed of liquidity adjustment.Third,through the study of the implementation effect of the IBBEA in the United States,we provide a theoretical basis for regulatory agencies to formulate policies.