文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：英汉句子结构中的“重量趋势”对比研究──兼与金积令先生商榷

英文题名：A Contrastive Study of English and Chinese “Weight” Tendencies in the Syntactic Structure

作者：邵志洪[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学外语系,上海200237

年份：2001

卷号：24

期号：3

起止页码：51

中文期刊名：外国语

外文期刊名：Journal of Foreign Languages

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2000】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2000_2002】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：汉语句子;英汉;句子结构;词序;语言类型;句法结构;现代汉语;存在;结构原则;国语

外文关键词：English; Chinese; syntactic structure; weight tendency

摘要：“汉英词序对比研究──句法结构中的前端重量原则和末端重量原则”（载《外国语》，1998.1）对比汉英两种语言在词序排列上的差异，提出现代汉语中左右词序线形排列的结构原则为“前端重量”原则。本文对此提出不同的意见，认为该文在讨论句子层面时，混淆了“重量”划分的标准。由于语言类型差异，在句子层面，英语中确实存在“末端重量原则”，汉语中其实并不存在“重量”方面的“原则”。按照语言结构中信息排列原则与汉语句子类型分析，如果说汉语句子“重量”上有什么趋势，也不应该是“前端重量”。因为至少英汉句子结构中的信息分布情况是相似的。而从句子层面看，汉语句首RL线形延伸以及汉语句子中位的容纳性，也都只能说明重量后置的趋势。
It is proposed that the structural principle influencing the linear ordering in modern Chinese should be the “front-weight” principle in“Front-weight principle and end-weight principle in syntactic structures—A contrastive study on word order in Chinese and English ”(Journal of Foreign Languages, 1998.1). We argue that as languages differ, while English boasts its “end-weight principle”, Chinese is free from the so-called principle in terms of “weight” at sentence level. If Chinese sentences have any tendency in weight, it should not be weight-fronting in light of the Chinese sentence pattern analyses and the syntactic information arrangement principle that both English and Chinese should follow, and Chinese sentences share the similar weight-dividing standard with English SVO structure. Furthermore, an end-weight, not front-weight tendency shows itself in the reversed linear expansion and the large mid-position capacity of a Chinese sentence.