文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：历史的误读:西方马克思主义女性主义关于两种生产理论

英文题名：History Misunderstanding:Western Marxism Feminism on Two Kinds of Production Theories

作者：秦美珠[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学哲学与政治学院,上海200237

年份：2005

卷号：20

期号：2

起止页码：73

中文期刊名：华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

语种：中文

中文关键词：马克思主义;女性主义;生产理论;生产方式;性别体系

外文关键词：the production of the means of existence; the reproduction of human beings; women's oppression

摘要：西方马克思主义女性主义以两种生产理论为分析工具,试图用资本主义与父权制、生产方式与再生产方式、阶级体系与性别体系的二元观点对妇女受压迫的综合因素进行分析。他们认为马克思、恩格斯过分强调物质生产,忽视人类自身生产,但他们过分强调妇女受压迫的父权制、再生产方式与性别体系的因素,忽视了妇女受压迫的阶级、种族及生产方式等因素的探讨,从而形成了对两种生产理论的误读。
Western Marxism feminism takes two kinds of production theories as their analysis tool and they attempted to analyze integrated factors of women's oppression from such dual categories as capitalism and patriarchy, the mode of production and the mode of reproduction, the class system and the gender system. They criticize Marx and Engel of over-emphasizing the production of the means of existence and negligence of the reproduction of human beings. But they are wrong in attaching too much women's oppression to factors like patriarchy, the mode of reproduction and the gender system, while neglecting class, race and the mode of production. Finally, they misunderstand two kinds of production theories.