文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中国治理模式的历史性突破

英文题名：A Historical Breakthrough in China's Governance Model

作者：曹锦清[1];刘炳辉[1,2]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院;[2]浙江大学宁波理工学院

年份：2017

期号：5

起止页码：9

中文期刊名：东南学术

外文期刊名：Southeast Academic Research

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2017_2018】；

基金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“构建全民共建共享的社会治理格局研究:聚焦人口流入型地区”(项目编号:15ZDC028)

语种：中文

中文关键词：治体;政体;治理为本;郡县国家

摘要：中西方围绕治国理政的争论长期被"政体问题"所困扰,这种问题意识和困惑最早始自明末来华的西方传教士利玛窦。自利玛窦以降,西方四百年来长期无法有效归类中国的政体,形成持久的困惑。治理为本是中国的政治实践和理论传统,传统"郡县国家"治理体系传承至今,中国注重利益共享的实践导向和西方注重政体形式的传统大不相同。西式选举的开展至少需要选举共识、选民单一、经济发展和任务稀少四大条件,这些都与中国当下的历史要求不相匹配。"四个自信"是超越西方政体问题意识与迷思的基础,体现了中国治理模式的历史性突破。在当代中国实现"伟大复兴"的过程中,中国共产党和社会主义两面旗帜不能倒。
The debate over governing the country between China and the West has long been puzzled by the'regime issue',this consciousness and puzzle originated from Matteo Ricci,a Western missionary,who came to China in the late Ming Dynasty.For 400 years since Matteo came to China,the Western world has not successfully classified Chinese political system,which is what we call the'Matteo’s Puzzle'.Governance-centered doctrine is China’s political practice and theoretical tradition,the traditional system of prefectures and counties has been inherited till nowadays,so there is a sharp difference between China’s practice-oriented doctrine focusing on shared interests and the Western tradition focusing on the form of regime or political system.The launch of Western-style elections requires at least four conditions–election consensus,unity voters,economic development and very few assignments,which do not fit the current historical requirements in China.Instead,the'four self-confidences'create the foundation for surmounting the'Matteo’s Puzzle'.In the process of achieving the'great rejuvenation'in contemporary China,two banners,the Communist Party of China and communism shall never fall.