文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：An Analytical Framework for Assessing Equity of Access to Public Electric Vehicle Charging Stations: The Case of Shanghai

作者：Cai, Yuchao[1];Zhang, Jie[1];Gu, Quan[1];Wang, Chenlu[1]

机构：[1]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Art Design & Media, Shanghai 200231, Peoples R China

年份：2024

卷号：16

期号：14

外文期刊名：SUSTAINABILITY

收录：;WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:001277724300001)，SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001277724300001)】；

基金：This research was funded by the Major Project of the National Social Science Foundation of China (21 & ZD215); the National Social Science and Arts Foundation of China (20BH154); and the Shanghai Social Science Special Fund (2019ZJX002).

语种：英文

外文关键词：accessibility; equity; public charging stations; electric vehicles; supply and demand

摘要：With the unprecedented growth of electric vehicles usage, the equitable population-based provision of public charging services has become an important concern in high-density urban centers. To address sustainability concerns, this study explores an analytical framework for assessing the equity of access to public charging services. By comprehensively analyzing factors such as accessibility, the Gini coefficient, the correlation coefficient, and supply-demand matching, we investigated the unequal access to public charging stations within 24 types of sites in central Shanghai. The spatial distribution and accessibility were visualized to illustrate differences in service access. Subsequently, social equity was assessed by considering the population distribution and identifying areas of supply-demand imbalance. The results show that 81% of households share only 10% of public charging services, suggesting a generalized inequality within areas and facilities. Residents of large-scale, low-density, low-grade neighborhoods have difficulties accessing services. Nearly 66.96% of subdistricts have supply and demand conflicts. In addition, priority types of improvement were identified and directions for improvement were suggested, as well as recommendations for the integration of PCSs with exterior built places. We also found significant differences in accessibility and equity at both the district and subdistrict level. The findings of this study will help urban planners assess and locate unequal areas and provide insights and the basis for further expansion into the analysis methods adopted at different stages to achieve sustainable development.