文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：A multilevel investigation on antecedents for employees' exploration of enterprise systems

作者：Peng, Zeyu[1];Guo, Xitong[2]

机构：[1]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China;[2]Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Management, Harbin, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China

年份：2019

卷号：28

期号：4

起止页码：439

外文期刊名：EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS

收录：;EI(收录号：20191306708047);WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:000465709600001)，SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000465709600001)】；

基金：The authors are grateful to the editors for their guidance and to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive suggestions. This study was partially funded by the National Natural Science of China [71571068, 71201058, 71622002, 71531007, 71471048, 71871074, 71871073].

语种：英文

外文关键词：Prof; Frantz Rowe; Dr Jason Thatcher; System exploration; multi-level; task variety; system modularity; local management commitment

摘要：Employees' system exploration behaviour is critical for contemporary firms to fully derive benefits from investments in an enterprise system (ES). Based on the adaptive structuration theory (AST), it is proposed that employees' exploration of an ES is mainly influenced by three fundamental components at different theoretical levels: task, technology, and the organisational environment. Accordingly, we develop a multilevel research model to interpret how task variety, system modularity, and local management commitment jointly affect employees' system exploration. Our model is tested with a survey of ES users in 35 business units of six firms that have already implemented enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, and several meaningful findings were discovered. At the individual level, both system modularity and task variety can directly affect employees' system exploration, and the direct effect of system modularity is positively moderated by task variety. Further, unit-level local management commitment can either directly affect, or positively moderate, the relationship between task variety and system exploration. Limitations and implications for research and practice are discussed.