文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：宏事件特征与英汉语位移运动事件的切分——一项基于语料库的对比分析

英文题名：The Macro-event Property and the Segmentation of English and Chinese Translocative Motion Events: A Corpus-based Contrastive Analysis

作者：郑国锋[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学外国语学院英语系,上海200237

年份：2014

卷号：30

期号：6

起止页码：74

中文期刊名：外国语文

外文期刊名：Foreign Languages and Literature

收录：北大核心:【北大核心2011】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：宏事件特征;位移运动事件;切分

外文关键词：macro-event property;translocative motion event;segmentation

摘要：将近70%的英汉语位移运动事件构式拥有类似的概念结构,在英汉语中切分相似。"肇始事件+到达事件"和"经过事件+到达事件"两类子事件组合是英汉语使用者最依赖的组合方式,两类组合之和在英汉语语料中均在90%以上。汉语使用者严格遵循时间律,依照子事件自然发生顺序组合子事件,并依此顺序将位移运动事件概念结构投射到语言构式上,体现出刚性特征,而英语使用者则比较灵活,体现出柔性特征,在组合子事件和将位移运动事件概念结构投射到语言构式上时,并不严格依照子事件自然发生顺序,展现出卫星框架语的不同特征。
The alignment reveals that about 70% the TME constructions are structured similarly in the source and target language. Moreover,in both English and Chinese,conceptualizations of TMEs are mapped mostly onto the DE ＋ AE pattern and the PE ＋ AE pattern. Patterns such as DE ＋ PE ＋ AE and DE ＋ PE are also found,but of only a very limited amount. Finally,we notice that Chinese users abide by rigidly the principle of temporal sequence when projecting the conceptualizations of TMEs onto the linguistic constructions,while English users demonstrate elasticity in front of the principle of temporal sequence in realizing the conceptualizations of TMEs. Therefore,we believe that English and Chinese are different satelliteframed languages.