文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：GTN损伤模型对C-Mn钢缺口拉伸试样延性断裂的预测

英文题名：PREDICTION OF DUCTILE FRACTURE IN TENSILE SPECIMENS WITH NOTCHES FOR A C-Mn STEEL BY USING GTN DAMAGE MODEL

作者：王国珍[1];张贺全[2];蒲吉斌[2];轩福贞[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学机械动力工程学院,上海200237;[2]兰州理工大学有色金属新材料省部共建国家重点实验室,兰州730050

年份：2008

卷号：30

期号：4

起止页码：647

中文期刊名：机械强度

外文期刊名：Journal of Mechanical Strength

收录：CSTPCD;;EI(收录号：20083711538087);Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2004】；CSCD:【CSCD2011_2012】；

基金：国家“863”计划项目(2006AA04Z413);教育部新世纪优秀人才计划项目(NCET-06-0414);上海市重点学科建设项目(B503)资助~~

语种：中文

中文关键词：损伤模型;延性断裂;韧性;缺口试样;夹杂物

外文关键词：Damage model; Ductile fracture; Touglmess; Notched specimen; Inclusion

摘要：用GTN(Gurson,Tvergaard,Needleman)损伤模型对不同缺口根半径的C-Mn钢缺口圆棒拉伸试样的延性断裂进行有限元模拟预测。结果表明,当缺口根半径R≤2 mm时,GTN模型对缺口拉伸时的最大载荷Pm、起裂载荷Pi、断裂载荷Pf和断裂功E的预测值与实验值较为接近。而当R>2 mm后,预测值与实验值的偏差变大。其原因在于GTN模型是基于微孔洞长大和聚合的延性断裂机理而建立,对于根半径较小,促使孔洞长大的三向应力度较高的缺口试样较为适用。GTN模型预测的三个特征载荷,尤其是表征韧性的断裂功E的值总体上高于实验测定值,并且其预测的延性起裂位置在R≥1 mm时也与实验观察不一致。其原因是GTN模型未考虑实际材料组织中具体的夹杂物/孔洞的尺寸、形态、分布和方位对损伤演化和断裂过程的影响。
The ductile fracture in tensile specimens with various notch root radiuses for a C-Mn steel has been predicted by using GTN （Gurson, Tvergaard, Needleman） damage model. The results show that, in the case of notch radius R ≤2 mm, the prediction values of the maximum load Pm, fracture initiation load Pi, fracture load Pf and fracture work E are close to the experimental values. But in the case of R 〉 2 mm, the difference between the prediction and experimental values becomes large. The reason for this is that GTN model is based on the ductile failure mechanism of void growth and coalescence, and it is suitable for the specimens with small notch radius that has high stress triaxiality for void growth. The values of GTN model prediction for the three characteristic loads, especially for the fracture work E characterizing toughness are generally higher than the experimental values. And also the prediction for the fracture initiation locations is not consistent with the experimental observation in the case of R ≥ 1 mm. The reasons for these are that the effects of the size, morphology, distribution and orientation of the inclusions/voids on the damage evolution and fracture process have not been considered in the GTN model.