文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：《作为艺术家的批评家》与哈特曼的解构主义批评

英文题名：Oscar Wilde's The Critic as Artist and Geoffrey Hartman's Deconstructionist Criticism

作者：陈丽[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学外国语学院英语系,上海200237

年份：2014

卷号：30

期号：1

起止页码：8

中文期刊名：外国语文

外文期刊名：Foreign Languages and Literature

收录：北大核心:【北大核心2011】；

基金：国家社科基金一般项目"英国唯美主义思想中的道德精神"(13BWW006)

语种：中文

中文关键词：批评的独立性与创造性;批评与文学的同一性;解构主义

外文关键词：the independence and creativity of criticism; literary commentary as literature; deconstructionism

摘要：王尔德在《作为艺术家的批评家》一文中反驳了批评依附于创作的观点,提出批评具有独立性与创造性,从而消解了批评与创作的界限。哈特曼的解构主义批评理论也赋予了批评以独立的地位,并认为文学批评正在越过界限成为文学。本文将借助哈特曼的解构主义批评,对王尔德的批评思想做后现代视角下的再审视。
This paper analyzes the correlation between Wilde＇ s critical theory in the late nineteenth century and Hartman＇ s deconstructionist criticism. Opposing the idea that criticism is inferior to creation, Oscar Wilde proposes in his The Critic as Artist that criticism is both creative and independent, thus claiming criticism is itself an art. Geoffrey Hartman, based on the deconstructionist theories, also holds that criticism is independent of the text it criticizes and literary commentary may cross the line and become literature. Resorting to Hartman＇ s deconstructionist criticism, this paper gives a postmodern re- examination of Wilde＇ s critical theory.