详细信息

网络中立管制的法律困境及其出路——以美国实践为视角    

Legal Dilemma of Network Neutrality Regulation and the Way out of It:From the Perspective of the U.S.Practice

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:网络中立管制的法律困境及其出路——以美国实践为视角

英文题名:Legal Dilemma of Network Neutrality Regulation and the Way out of It:From the Perspective of the U.S.Practice

作者:吴亮[1]

机构:[1]华东理工大学法学院

年份:2015

卷号:37

期号:3

起止页码:127

中文期刊名:环球法律评论

外文期刊名:Global Law Review

收录:国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】;CSSCI:【CSSCI2014_2016】;

基金:2013年国家社科基金青年项目"行政调查取证制度的规范化研究"(13CFX036);2014年上海市教育科学项目"青年学生的网络不当表达及其防治与教育模式研究"(B14007)的阶段性成果

语种:中文

中文关键词:威瑞森案;网络中立管制;网络运营商;差别对待

摘要:网络中立管制的本质是要求互联网平等对待网络内容和访问者,其核心是"透明性"、"禁止屏蔽"、"禁止不当歧视"。网络中立管制面临着两难困境:政府如果听任网络运营商、服务商的流量限制、付费优先权等差别对待行为,就会损害互联网的创新、平等、非歧视以及言论自由环境。但是如果严格监管,也可能损害互联网产业的发展和消费者整体利益。美国围绕《维护互联网开放性指令》的合法性争议,集中体现了网络中立管制面临的法律困境。2014年威瑞森案及其后续发展表明,美国针对该困境的解决对策是:在经济层面采取"原则管制,例外不管制"模式,在非经济层面采取"言论提供者的言论自由优先于言论传输者"模式。我国也有必要引入网络中立管制管理差别对待现象,将网络中立管制的若干规则引入互联网立法,建立健全对违反网络中立行为的长效执法监管机制,限制运营商、网络服务商的信息言论审查权,强化平等透明的网络服务机制。
Network neutrality regulation, which means the equal treatment of Internet content and visitors and focuses on transparency and prohibition of shielding and discrimination, is faced with a dilemma: on the one hand, if the government allows ICPs and ISPs to practice such differential treatments as restriction of flow and payment p^iority, it will undermine the principles of innovation, equality, non discrimination, and th^freedom of speech on the Inter- net. But on the other hand, the strengthening of regulation may harm the development of the In- ternet industry and the overall interest of consumers. The approach taken by the U. S. to this di- lemma is to "regulate as a rule and not to regulate as an exception" at the economic level and to "give priority to the freedom of speech of the providers of opinions over that of the transmitters of opinions" at the non-economic level. China needs, to introduce network neutrality regulation system to regulate the practice of differential treatment, and to establish and improve a long- term law enforcement supervision system, so as to restrict service providers' right to censor in- formation and speeches, and increase the equality and transparency of the mechanism for the provision of Internet service.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©华东理工大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-7 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心