文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：双重抛弃:社会与社会学的张力 兼与肖瑛商榷

英文题名：Mutual Abandonment:Tension between Society and Sociology:A Discussion with Mr. Xiao Ying

作者：郭强[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学人文科学研究院

年份：2010

卷号：30

期号：3

起止页码：21

中文期刊名：社会

外文期刊名：Chinese Journal of Sociology

收录：人大复印报刊资料;CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2008】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2010_2011】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：社会;社会学;张力;回归

外文关键词：return, society, sociology, tension

摘要：没有社会的社会学和没有社会学的社会是社会与社会学彼此抛弃的必然结果。社会学要回归社会,必须明确其知识体系的基础,即社会和社会性的概念界定、基本内涵、社会主体。但社会概念的空泛化、去人化使其合法性、根性得以丧失。肖瑛给出了回归社会学的辅路途径,布迪厄引入"场域"代替"社会"。社会与社会学的张力导致社会与社会学相行渐远,社会和社会学的双重失根也成为必然。社会的失序、社会性中介的断裂、媒体与大众单一化终结了社会性,也终结着社会学。社会与社会学的张力的化解成为社会和社会学发展必须跨越的一道坎。
Society without sociology and sociology without society are the inevitable results of their mutual abandonment. For sociology to go back in touch with society, it must be clear about the fundamentals of its own knowledge system, namely, the definitional boundaries of society and sociality, their basic internal meanings, and social subjects. But the vagueness and non-humanization of social concepts have ended up with their legitimacy and origins lost. Xiao Ying excogitated a side way for the return of sociology ~ Bourdieu introduced the concept of＂Field＂ to replace ＂Society. ＂ The tension between society and sociology has led to the distancing of the two from each other, and further, the expected loss of the origins of both society and sociology. The social disorder, the breakage in social intermediation, and the singleness in the media and the public have terminated sociality as well as sociology. The resolution of the tension between the two has become the challenge to the development of society and sociology.