文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：人民城市的价值关怀与治理的限度

英文题名：Value Orientation of People’s City and Moderate Governance

作者：何雪松[1];侯秋宇[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院,上海200237

年份：2021

期号：1

起止页码：57

中文期刊名：南京社会科学

外文期刊名：Nanjing Journal of Social Sciences

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;社科基金资助期刊;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2021_2022】；

基金：国家社科基金重大项目“社会治理背景下我国社会工作行动本土化理论框架与实践体系研究”(16ZDA084)的阶段性成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：人民城市;过度治理;管理逻辑;生活逻辑;适度治理

外文关键词：people’s city;excessive governance;logic of management;logic of livelihoods;moderate governance

摘要：人民城市的治理要从人民的生活出发,从可持续的生计出发,从激发社会的活力出发,这样才能以民生为要、聚合众力,促成治理的转型升级。但是,基层可能会以"治理"之名行"管理"之实,而管理的逻辑遭遇生活的逻辑之后,可能会出现过度治理,这不符合人民城市的价值关怀。城市社区的过度治理可以分成四种类型:目标赶超型、利益联合型、盲目竞争型和创新异化型。过度治理是"运动"、竞争和量化机制的结果,但更为深层次的原因是对"以人民为中心"的城市人民性的价值偏离。反思并纠偏过度治理,需要站在人民城市的生活逻辑之上,将顶层设计与问计于民结合起来,形成以美好生活为目标、尊重多样性、强调人民参与的适度治理。
The governance of people’s city must serve people’s lives,sustainable livelihoods,and societal vitality,so the modernization of city’s governance could center on people’s wellbeing and build on social cohesion.Yet the street-level governments might excise"management"in the name of"governance",and the logic of management takes advantage the logic of livelihoods,resulting in excessive governance.Excessive governance could be divided into four different patterns:Target Catching-up,Interest Coalition,Unbridled Competition,and Alienated Innovation.Excessive governance is the consequence of"movement",competition,and quantification mechanism,furthermore,is the consequence of deviating from"people-centered"value orientation of city.To rectify such excessive governance,moderate governance should be based on the logic of people’s livelihood,combine top-down and bottom-up,fit for the purpose of the good life,respect for diversity,and emphasize people’s participation.