文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：General, Work-Specific, and Work-Role Conscientiousness Measures in Predicting Work Criteria: A Comparative Perspective

作者：Wang, Qiang[1];Liao, Yi[2];Burns, Gary N.[3]

机构：[1]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Shanghai, Peoples R China;[2]Southwestern Univ Finance & Econ, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China;[3]Florida Inst Technol, Melbourne, FL 32901 USA

年份：2021

卷号：70

期号：1

起止页码：358

外文期刊名：APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW-PSYCHOLOGIE APPLIQUEE-REVUE INTERNATIONALE

收录：;WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:000501354100001)】；

基金：This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 17BGL100), National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71871184), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JBK160501, JBK18JYT02, and JBK190504).

语种：英文

摘要：The current study compared general, work-specific, and work-role measures of conscientiousness as predictors of job satisfaction, organizational commitment, turnover intention, job engagement, and task performance. As expected, work-role conscientiousness yielded stronger relationships with five of the ten work-related criteria than general conscientiousness, and with six of the ten criteria than work-specific conscientiousness. More importantly, work-role conscientiousness displayed incremental validity in predicting nearly all work-related criteria, when controlling for general and work-specific conscientiousness alone or in combination. It is also worth noting that six of ten analyses found that work-role conscientiousness demonstrated greater relative importance compared to its counterparts. Finally, we found that the context in which the items were completed moderated the relationships between work-role conscientiousness and two work-related criteria (i.e., job satisfaction and organizational commitment). Together, these results suggest that researchers should consider the work-role measure of conscientiousness in the prediction of work criteria.