详细信息

论管理学者的迷思——一个全球性的而非本土性的现象    

On Management Scholars' Perplexity——A Global Academic Phenomena Not Local Phenomena

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:论管理学者的迷思——一个全球性的而非本土性的现象

英文题名:On Management Scholars' Perplexity——A Global Academic Phenomena Not Local Phenomena

作者:郭毅[1]

机构:[1]华东理工大学商学院,上海200237

年份:2013

期号:6

起止页码:16

中文期刊名:管理学家(学术版)

语种:中文

中文关键词:组织理论;组织行为理论;理论构建;管理学研究的边界

外文关键词:organization theory organizational behavior theory construction boundary of management research

摘要:现代管理学研究可以划分为2个主要的领域:针对企业处置组织与环境关系、以理论建构见长的组织理论(organizational theory,OT)和针对企业处置各种内部关系、以研究方法见长的组织行为(organizational behavior,OB)。相应地,学者们也就面临着两种选择:建立一个庞大的管理学理论架构以指导实践;或是以研究方法取胜,使之得以成为一门可以传承和发展的严肃学科。就目前来看,为了获取学科合法性以及符合学术评审要求,学者们倾向于选择后者。本文认为,把管理学科过度科学化容易使管理学研究陷入"管理就是为了实现优化",或是使得管理学者与实践者过分夸大组织自身对外部世界和内部组织的影响能力等陷阱;本文主张,学者们应该更加重视环境因素以及对企业行为的约束,深入观察现象并建立假说以促进管理理论的发展。
Modern management research can be divided into two main steams: Organization theory(OT), which focuses on interaction between environment and fi rm and theory construction, and organizational behavior(OB), which focuses on intra-fi rm relationships and scientifi c research methods. Therefore, researches in management are faced with two choices: constructing a comprehensive theory frame to direct practices or constructing management discipline more 'scientifi c'through scientifi c research methods. In current situation, researches prefer the later one in order to obtain the legality of management research and meet the established academic review standards. We think that overemphasizing the scientifi c aspect of management research may mislead management as 'optimize' or induce scholars and practioners to overvalue the infl uence of fi rm on the environment and the fi rm itself. At last, we conclude that, in order to promote the development of management theory and research, researchers should pay more attention to environment factors of fi rm, management reality and theory construction.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©华东理工大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-7 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心