文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：Housing Reform,Life Course and Urban Housing Acquisition(1980-2010)

作者：Kaize Wu[1]

机构：[1]Social and Public Administration School,East China University of Science and Technology,Room 232,Tuanjie Building,130 Meilong Road,Shanghai 200237,People’s Republic of China

年份：2019

卷号：6

期号：1

起止页码：278

中文期刊名：The Journal of Chinese Sociology

外文期刊名：中国社会学杂志（英文）

收录：Scopus

基金：“Research on Housing Supply and Security Mechanism of Migrant Workers in the New Era”project of the National Planning Office of Philosophy and Social Science(No.:18CSH056);“Research on the Response Mechanism of New Citizens’Housing Poverty in the Context of New Urbanization”project of Peking University-Lincoln Research Institute Center for Urban Development and Land Policy Research Foundation(No.:FS-2016100107);“Research on Shanghai Youth Talents’Public Housing Supply and Service Mechanism”project of the Foundation of Shanghai Soft Science Research Program(No.:18692104700);the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

语种：英文

中文关键词：Welfare housing propertization;Housing commercialization;Life course;Differential mode of association

摘要：Based on data from the Guangzhou Household Survey in 2010 and event history model,this paper analyzes how the interactions between the housing marketization reform and individual life course affect Chinese citizens’acquisition of property rights of their first house.Research shows that the differential mode of association in housing marketization reform and diverse reform strategies have created clear period effect and cohort effect on housing acquisition.The dual housing market system,consisted of welfare housing propertization and housing commercialization,has reduced housing inequality between people within and out of the establishment,but aggravated housing inequality between the elite and non-elite,and extended the administrative elites’advantage in acquiring welfare housing.During the course of the housing reform,institutional segmentation and market differentiation have led to overlapping and mutually reinforcing types of housing inequality,exacerbating housing differentiation for the younger cohort through the intergenerational transmission.