文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：住房市场化与住房不平等——基于CHIP和CFPS数据的研究

英文题名：Housing Marketization and Housing Inequality:A Study Based on CHIP and CFPS Data

作者：吴开泽[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院

年份：2019

期号：6

起止页码：89

中文期刊名：社会学研究

外文期刊名：Sociological Studies

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2019_2020】；

基金：国家社科基金青年项目“新时代农民工住房供应与保障机制研究”(18CSH056)资助

语种：中文

中文关键词：住房产权化;住房产业化;住房金融化;住房不平等

摘要：本文采用制度分析视角,基于CHIP和CFPS数据研究中国城市住房市场化改革进程及其对住房不平等的影响机制。住房市场化经历了住房产权化、住房产业化和住房金融化三个阶段,住房从消费品逐渐变为投资品和金融品,并成为城市家庭财产主体和社会分化的重要机制。住房市场化显著改善了城市家庭的住房条件,但加大了代际和不同收入阶层的住房面积差异,拉大了高学历、高职业地位和高收入群体与普通居民的住房资产和住房数量差异。房价持续上涨使住房财富效应膨胀,收入分层与住房分层双重叠加形成的分化效应加剧了21世纪初中国城市的贫富分化。未来的住房制度改革应实现住房经济功能和社会功能的均衡,避免贫富分化加剧。
From the perspective of institutional analysis,based on CHIP data and CFPS data,this paper analyzes housing marketization reform process and its influence on housing inequality.There are three stages of housing propertization,housing industrialization and housing financialization during the housing marketization.Housing changes from consumer goods to investment goods and financial derivative.It also becomes the main source of wealth for urban families and critical mechanism of social differentiation.Housing marketization effectively improves urban families housing conditions,while aggravating gaps among age cohorts and classes in terms of housing size,the number of properties,etc.The continuous increase of housing price expands the wealth effect of housing.Income and housing stratification intensify wealth polarization in urban China in the early 21st century.This paper proposes that future housing reform should balance the economic and social function of housing,and avoid wealth polarization aggravation.