详细信息

Toward energy-efficient extraction of aromatics from light cycle oil using deep eutectic solvents: Insights from experimental and process evaluation  ( SCI-EXPANDED收录 EI收录)  

文献类型:期刊文献

英文题名:Toward energy-efficient extraction of aromatics from light cycle oil using deep eutectic solvents: Insights from experimental and process evaluation

作者:Zhang, Yaxi[1];Song, Licheng[1];Wei, Xiang[1];Liu, Qian[1];Song, Zhen[1];Qi, Zhiwen[1];Cheng, Hongye[1]

机构:[1]East China Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Chem Engn & Low Carbon Technol, 130 Meilong Rd, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China

年份:2026

卷号:324

外文期刊名:CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE

收录:;EI(收录号:20260219899758);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:001663617600001)】;

基金:The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support by National Natural Science Foundation of China (22478110) , Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (24ZR1415100) , and State Key Laboratory of Chemical Engineering (SKL-ChE-23C02) .

语种:英文

外文关键词:Light cycle oil; Extraction-regeneration process; Deep eutectic solvent; Process simulation; Energy consumption

摘要:Efficient separation of aromatics and alkanes in light cycle oil (LCO) is critical for upgrading LCO into high-value chemicals; however, the energy costs of the entire extraction-regeneration process, influenced by LCO composition and extractant selection, remain inadequately explored, thereby limiting the economic viability of LCO upgrading. In this work, the influences of aromatic structure and composition in both raw and hydrotreated LCO on extraction, regeneration, and process energy consumption were systematically investigated. Two levulinic acid-based deep eutectic solvents (DESs) were employed as benchmark solvents. Liquid-liquid equilibrium experiments demonstrated that diaromatic-rich LCO significantly enhances extraction efficiency compared with monoaromatic-rich feeds. Process simulations further confirmed that diaromatic-rich LCO reduces total energy consumption by similar to 23.3 % compared with hydrotreated LCO using TBPB:LEA (1:4). Both DESs can achieve >= 98 % aromatic purity and recovery; however, TBPB:LEA (1:4) favors energy savings owing to its higher distribution coefficient (up to 0.665 for 1-methylnaphthalene and 0.219 for tetralin), whereas TPAB:LEA (1:4) is preferred when higher aromatic purity (>= 99 %) is required due to its higher selectivity (up to 539 for 1-methylnaphthalene and 208 for tetralin). These findings offer valuable guidance for optimizing feedstock and solvent selection strategies toward energy-efficient separation of aromatics and alkanes during LCO upgrading.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©华东理工大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-7 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心