详细信息

Assessment of the impact of bubble size modelling in CFD simulations of alternative bubble column configurations operating in the heterogeneous regime  ( SCI-EXPANDED收录 EI收录)  

文献类型:期刊文献

英文题名:Assessment of the impact of bubble size modelling in CFD simulations of alternative bubble column configurations operating in the heterogeneous regime

作者:Huang, Zibin[1];McClure, Dale D.[2];Barton, Geoffrey W.[2];Fletcher, David F.[2];Kavanagh, John M.[2]

机构:[1]East China Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Chem Engn, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China;[2]Univ Sydney, Sch Chem & Biomol Engn, Bldg J01, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia

年份:2018

卷号:186

起止页码:88

外文期刊名:CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE

收录:;EI(收录号:20181905143699);WOS:【SCI-EXPANDED(收录号:WOS:000436773200009)】;

基金:Zibin Huang was supported by the East China University of Science and Technology. The authors would like to acknowledge funding from the ARC Training Centre for the Australian Food Processing Industry in the 21st Century (IC140100026).

语种:英文

外文关键词:CFD; Single bubble size models; MUSIG; Bubble column; Airlift column; Churn turbulent flow

摘要:Modelling bubble columns operating in the churn turbulent flow regime is a considerable challenge due to their complex and transient behaviour. A key modelling decision is how best to model the bubble size distribution, with a range of approaches existing from the relatively simple option of using a single, representative bubble size to more complex population balance approaches. In this comparative study, we have examined various approaches (i.e. constant and variable single bubble size models, dual bubble size models, and both homogeneous and inhomogeneous MUSIG models). Model predictions were compared with experimental data from three different configurations of a pilot-scale column (0.39 m in diameter and 2 m in height) operated at industrially relevant superficial gas velocities of 0.16 and 0.25 m s(-1). The single bubble size models gave reasonable agreement with experimental data for the 'symmetrical' configuration, with the variable bubble size model having the major advantage of providing acceptable predictions of the mean bubble size (without this having to be provided as a model input). Implementation of multiple bubble size models did not lead to any substantial improvement in the modelling fit with the experimental data, leading to the inescapable conclusion that the standard bubble breakup and coalescence kernels proposed in the literature do not adequately describe bubble transformations taking place under heterogeneous operating conditions. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©华东理工大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-7 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心