文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：被遗忘权本土化的路径选择与规范重塑--以《个人信息保护法》第47条为中心

英文题名：Path Selection and Norm Reconstruction of the Localization of the Right to Be Forgotten:About Article 47 of Personal Information Protection Law

作者：王义坤[1];刘金祥[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学法学院

年份：2022

期号：3

起止页码：96

中文期刊名：财经法学

外文期刊名：Law and Economy

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI_E2021_2022】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：被遗忘权;被忘却价值;利益平衡;个人信息保护法

外文关键词：right to be forgotten;forgotten value;balance of interests;personal information protection law

摘要：被遗忘权是大数据时代实现被忘却价值的一种基本方式,但也与知情权、言论自由等相关权益存在冲突。我国《个人信息保护法》没有单独规定被遗忘权,而是采取在第47条规定删除权制度的囊括规范方式。但被遗忘权依旧有其制度的核心价值,即消除合法公开的负面信息对个体利益和发展的不必要影响。在具体路径实现上,宜采取事后救济为主的要件个案判定方式,以信息主体案涉利益保护的正当性,以及保护方式的必要性为主要考量因素,通过对前置信息处理合法合规、主体和适用场景限定等一系列规范框架的建立,来实现被遗忘权的有限价值存在。
The right to be forgotten is a basic way to realize the value of being forgotten in the era of big data, and there is a conflict between the right to be forgotten and the rights and interests related to the right to know and freedom of speech.The Personal Information Protection Law of China does not prescribe the right to be forgotten separately, but adopt the way of including it in the deletion right of the Article 47.But the right to be forgotten still has its core value, which is to eliminate the unnecessary impact of legal disclosure of negative information on individual interests and development.About the concrete approach of realization, it is appropriate to adopt the method of judging the main elements ex post, considering mainly the justification of interest protection, and the necessity of protection.The realization of the limited existence value of the right to be forgotten needs the establishment of a series of normative frameworks, such as the legal and regulatory framework for the pre-processing of information, subject and applicable scene qualification.