文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：政府介入与发展阶段：发展策略的新制度分析

英文题名：Developmental State and the Stages of Development: A Neo-Institutional Analysis of the Strategies of Economic Development

作者：陈玮[1];耿曙[2]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院,上海市200237;[2]浙江大学公共管理学院社会学系,杭州市310058

年份：2017

期号：6

起止页码：103

中文期刊名：政治学研究

外文期刊名：CASS Journal of Political Science

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2017_2018】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：政府介入;发展型国家;产业政策;发展阶段

外文关键词：economic development;developmental state;industrial policy;stages of development

摘要：政府主导的发展策略,往往在发展初期绩效卓著,却在成功追赶后成效逐渐式微,表现出明显的阶段性差异。因此,作者提出政府介入的"发展阶段"的解释。本文先根据格申克龙的思路,将后进国家的发展历程划分为"追赶"与"领先"两个阶段,"追赶"阶段重点在技术模仿,"领先"阶段关键在技术创新;处于"追赶阶段"的政府介入,往往能够集中资源奖励技术模仿,创造经济高速增长,但进入"领先阶段"后,政府却难以有效甄别技术创新,难以推动经济继续增长。针对上述假说,作者一方面通过新制度理论建立分析框架,以信息甄别、考核监督、投入风险三项机制论证不同阶段政府介入的成效,另一方面,作者搜集了全球77个国家从1950到2011年间的政治经济数据,并利用统计模型验证政府介入在不同发展阶段成效的差异。
For late developers,state intervention is probably the only approach for economic catchup. But after achieved remarkable economic achievement,the developmental states in East Asia have gradually given up the heavy intervention as their development strategies. Then what can we learn from them? Judging from their experiences,probably we should shift our concerns from"is state intervention good?"to "when should state intervene and when should it withdraws?"As for the question,inspired by Gerschenkron's studies,we argue that the effects of state intervention have a lot to do with the stage of development of the country. The paper thus divides the development course of late-comers into two stages of development: the stage of catching-up and the stage of leading,and the focus of the former is"technological imitations"while the mission of the later is"technological innovations. "We argue that during the stage of catching-up,the economy can rely on the state to facilitate technological imitation and promote economic growth. Once moving into the stage of leading,however,the state can do little to encourage technological innovations and sustain economic growth. Based on this "stage hypothesis,"this paper further specifies three mechanisms of state intervention,i. e.,information advantage,performance assessment and input concentration,and uses cross-national quantitative data to further testify the hypothesis.