文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：“跳板”抑或“屏障”?——进口国知识产权保护对中国植物类农产品出口贸易的影响

英文题名：Springboard or Barrier?The Impact of Importing Countries’Intellectual Property Protection on China’s Botanical Agricultural Export

作者：张琳琛[1];董银果[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学商学院

年份：2020

期号：8

起止页码：124

中文期刊名：中国农村经济

外文期刊名：Chinese Rural Economy

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2019_2020】；

基金：国家自然科学基金项目“SPS措施与农产品质量升级的耦合机制研究”(项目编号:71673087);“农产品SPS适度保护水平的形成机理与应用策略”(项目编号:71373154);“产业动态视角下贸易政策和产业政策的协调机制与中国实践”(项目编号:71573171);上海市浦江学者基金项目“农产品进口与中国SPS保护水平研究”(项目编号:15PJC048);华东理工大学重大交叉培育基金(JKN022021005)的阶段性成果。

语种：中文

中文关键词：农产品知识产权保护;跳板效应;屏障效应;异质性检验

外文关键词：Intellectual Property Protection ofAgricultural Product;Springboard Effect;Barrier Effect;Heterogeneity Test

摘要：随着《保护植物新品种公约》和《与贸易有关的知识产权保护协定》的实施,农产品知识产权保护在国际范围内得到加强。本文基于1995~2017年中国与100个国家的贸易面板数据,在评估进口国农业领域内知识产权保护强度的基础上,定量分析其对中国植物类农产品出口贸易的影响。研究发现:进口国知识产权保护对中国植物类农产品出口贸易同时产生"跳板"和"屏障"效应,前者主要正向作用于贸易广度,而后者则抑制了贸易深度增长;通过采用不同类型知识产权保护指标、制度距离以及比较优势检验,验证了农产品知识产权保护的作用形式;异质性检验发现,知识产权保护的"跳板"和"屏障"效应在不同国家类型、中国加入WTO前后以及在不同知识产权保护强度下存在显著差异;通过分行业回归检验,发现不同植物类农产品贸易受发达国家和发展中国家知识产权保护影响的敏感程度不同,其均有利于中国部分果蔬类、植物提取物、烟草等行业的出口增长,但进口国知识产权保护在更多的其它植物产品类型中产生显著的抑制作用;上述研究结论在Heckman两阶段、PPML和OLS固定效应模型回归中均显示一致,证明了本文研究结论的稳健性。本文将知识产权保护拓展到农业贸易领域,为中国植物类农产品出口贸易最优策略选择提供理论和事实依据。
With the implementation of the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants(UPOV)and Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights(TRIPS),the protection of intellectual property rights of agricultural products has been strengthened worldwide.Based on the panel data of China’s trade in agricultural products with 100 countries from 1995 to 2017,this article measures the intensity of intellectual property protection of agricultural products in importing countries and analyzes its impact on China’s export trade of botanical agricultural products.The results show that the protection of world intellectual property plays both“springboard”and“barrier”effects on the export trade of agricultural products in China.The former has a positive effect on the breadth of trade,while the latter has a negative effect on the depth of trade.This study further uses different types of intellectual property protection indicators,institutional distance and comparative advantage test to verify the role of intellectual property protection.Through the heterogeneity test,the“springboard”and“barrier”effects of intellectual property protection remain significantly different,being in various country types,before and after China’accession to the WTO and under different intensity of intellectual property protection.A regression test of industry heterogeneity shows that the sensitivity of different agricultural products trade to the impact of intellectual property protection in developed and developing countries is different,which is conducive to the export growth of some fruits and vegetables,plant extracts,tobacco and other industries in China.But the intellectual property protection of importing countries has a significant inhibitory effect in more types of other botanical products.The above results are consistent in the Heckman two-stage regression,PPML and OLS fixed effect model regression,which proves the robustness of the conclusions in this study.This article extends the protection of intellectual property rights to the field of agricultural trade,providing both theoretical and practical basis for the optimal strategy selection of China’s botanical agricultural products export trade.