文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：Firm response, action visibility and consumers' legitimacy judgment

作者：Yuan, Zhimei[1];Guo, Yi[1];Wang, Xingdong[2]

机构：[1]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Business, Shanghai, Peoples R China;[2]Jiangxi Agr Univ, Sch Econ & Trade, Nanchang, Jiangxi, Peoples R China

年份：2019

卷号：34

期号：2

起止页码：75

外文期刊名：AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BUSINESS

收录：WOS:【ESCI(收录号:WOS:000479230900002)】；

语种：英文

外文关键词：Purchase intention; Product-harm crisis; Action visibility; Firm response; Legitimacy judgment

摘要：Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the role of action visibility in moderating the relationship between firm response and individual legitimacy judgment. Since a firm may decouple its public commitment from its actual practice to cope with conflicting stakeholder interests, visibility is important for consumers to make judgment because it is difficult for them to observe a firm's actual fulfillment of its public commitment to quality assurance after a product-harm crisis. Design/methodology/approach Scenario-based mixed design experiments were employed and 718 valid responses were collected. Findings The results indicated that, while acknowledging responsibility produced more favorable legitimacy judgment than denial, decoupling produced no better judgment than denial. However, higher visibility significantly amplified the effect size. Specifically, under the condition of high visibility, not only did acknowledging responsibility produce much more favorable judgment than denial, but so did decoupling. Originality/value Much of the extant research on response strategy for organizations to deal with product-harm crisis ignored the moderating role of action visibility. Past research on legitimacy judgment focused on organization. This paper combined firm response, action visibility and individual-level legitimacy judgment.