文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：“法、理、情”的融合:消极“土政策”在乡村治理中何以存在和运行——以河南省瓮厢村土地调整为例

英文题名：The Integration of “Law, Reason, and Emotion”: How Do Negative “LocalPolicies” Exist and Operate in Rural Governance? An Example of the LandReallocation of Wengxiang Village in Henan Province

作者：赵雅倩[1];王芳[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院

年份：2023

期号：5

起止页码：81

中文期刊名：中国农村观察

外文期刊名：China Rural Survey

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2023_2024】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：“法、理、情”;消极“土政策”;乡村治理;农村土地调整

外文关键词：“Law,Reason,and Emotion”;Negative“Local Policies”;Rural Governance;Rural Land Reallocation

摘要：本文以河南省瓮厢村土地调整为例,在对该村土地调整中相关“土政策”进行梳理的基础上,对其第4次土地调整中的“外嫁女”和“新媳妇”分地事件进行分析,从“法、理、情”融合视角切入,探讨消极“土政策”在乡村治理中何以存在和运行。研究结果表明:分地“土政策”在相关利益主体中均能获得相应的社会承认,从而拥有了一定的合法性,这是其存在的前提条件;土地产权所带来的收益有限,农民地权敏感度不高,使分地“土政策”既未受到强烈的质疑也没有被取缔,这是其合理存在的客观条件;来自村庄关系网络的情感制约使分地“土政策”具有一定的合情性,这是其存在和持续运行的制约条件;消极“土政策”在合法性、合理性和合情性三个层面都能获得一定的保障,从而可以存在和运行。此外,中央的“不得调地”与村庄的土地调整不是二元对立的。在保证“不得调地”的政策大方向下,只有推进土地确权及其颁证工作的规范与完善,加快土地流转、土地规模化经营和土地租赁市场的培育,才能使土地承包关系中存在的张力得到最大限度的消解。
Taking the land reallocation in Wengxiang Village,Henan Province as an example,based on the relevant“local policies”in the village’s land reallocation,this paper analyzes a rural“marrying off”and“new daughter-in-law”land division event in the fourth round of land reallocation.From the perspective of“law,reason,and emotion”integration,the paper explores the existence and operation of negative“local policies”in rural governance.The results indicate that the“local policy”of land reallocation has received corresponding social recognition among relevant stakeholders,which is the legal prerequisite for its existence.The benefits brought by land property rights are limited,and farmers’sensitivity to land property rights is not significant,preventing the“local policy”of land reallocation from being questioned or banned,which is the objective condition for its existence.The emotional constraints attributed by the village relationship network have provided emotional base for the“local policy”of land reallocation,which is the constraints on its existence and operation.The negative“local policy”of land reallocation can receive certain support in terms of legitimacy,rationality,and emotionality,enabling its existence and operation.The central government’s policy of“no land transfer”and village land reallocation should not be viewed as binary opposition.In the overall direction of ensuring the policy of“no land transfer”,only by accelerating the standardization and improvement of land ownership confirmation and certification work,as well as accelerating land transfer,large-scale land management,and land leasing market cultivation,can the tension existing in the land contract relationship be dissolved to the maximum extent.