文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：恩格斯自然观中劳动主体性思想及当代价值

英文题名：Labour Subjectivity in Engels’View of Nature and Its Contemporary Value

作者：杜仕菊[1];程明月[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学马克思主义学院

年份：2020

期号：11

起止页码：40

中文期刊名：毛泽东邓小平理论研究

外文期刊名：Studies on Mao Zedong and Deng Xiaoping Theories

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2019_2020】；

基金：2018年度教育部人文社科专项课题“新时代的哲学意涵”[18JF046]阶段性成果。

语种：中文

中文关键词：恩格斯;自然观;无产阶级;人民立场;环境权益

摘要："劳动主体性"肯定了"无产阶级"的劳动主体地位,彰显了恩格斯自然观的价值立场,从根本上超越了旧的形而上学自然观。"劳动主体性"内涵应从两层意义上把握:在应然维度体现为无产阶级的劳动主体,在实然维度体现为异化"、资本主体"的劳动。西方马克思主义学者忽视恩格斯自然观中"劳动主体性"的能动意义,并炮制出"马恩对立论"。对此,需要回到《自然辩证法》澄明"劳动主体性"的重要地位。新时代语境下,"以人民为中心"继承发展了恩格斯自然观"劳动主体性"所秉持的无产阶级立场,这一立场满足人民优美生态环境需要、保障人民环境权益,彰显了中国特色社会主义生态文明建设的主体逻辑。
"Labour subjectivity"affirms the labour subject status of the proletariat,manifests the value position of Engels’concept of nature,and fundamentally transcends the old metaphysical concept of nature.Theconnotation of"labour subjectivity"should be grasped in two senses:in the rational dimension as the labour subject of the proletariat,and in thereal dimension as the labour of the alienated"capital subject".Western Marxist scholars ignored the dynamic significance of the"laboursubjectivity"in Engels’concept of nature and concocted the"Marxist-Engelsian antithesis".In this regard,only by going back to the Dialectics of Nature can we clarify the important status of the"labour subjectivity".In the context of the new era,"people-centredness"inherits and developsthe proletarian position of the"labour subjectivity"in Engels’concept of nature.This position satisfies the people’s need for a beautiful ecologicalenvironment,safeguards their environmental rights and interests,and manifests the subject logic of the socialist construction of ecological civilization with Chinese characteristics.