文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：归向何处:对本土知识传统的审思

英文题名：Where to Go Back:Reflections on the Indigenous Knowledge Tradition

作者：熊万胜[1,2]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院,教授上海200237;[2]中国城乡发展研究中心,主任上海200237

年份：2018

期号：5

起止页码：106

中文期刊名：探索与争鸣

外文期刊名：Exploration and Free Views

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2017】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2017_2018】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：知行合一;本土知识传统;实践性知识;解释性知识

外文关键词：Unity of Knowing and Doing;Indigenous Knowledge Tradition;Practical Knowledge

摘要：就长期热议的社会科学本土化问题而言,当下真正应该被关注的不是问题、理论或者方法的"出处",而是研究的"归处"。实际上,存在一种以知行合一为内核的本土知识传统,其有助于思考实践过程和知识过程的关系,即在知行合一的状态下,具有主体间性的知识过程是如何发生的。具体而言,首先完成实践的知识化,可以将具体的实践过程理解成是一个"我"对"个体"的把握过程,从而产生直接实在感。以此为逻辑原点,一个新的知识分类体系有助于完成知识的实践化。进而,在新的知识谱系中,实践性知识凸显出来。这也是中国传统写作的主要知识形式,通常以中国式议论文的结构进行写作。与实践性知识相对应的是解释性知识,它具有更高的主体间性,通常以论文的规范进行写作。在中国的政治与知识的关系中,存在一种便于决策者追求知行合一的政治体系。这个政治体系也是一个以决策者为核心的社会认知体系,在"体"与"系"的张力中,与决策者的实践过程距离不等的各种知识过程都能够找到自己的位置。当中国社会科学学者"中介者"的位置开始崩塌,归向何处正在成为一个要命的问题。
This article starts from the hot topic of localization of social sciences and thinks that what should be really concerned is not the problem, theory or method of "from where", but of "go back where". This article raises the problem of how to explain Chinese indigenous knowledge tradition. There is a kind of indigenous knowledge tradition based on the unity of knowing and doing. The core of argument lies in the relationship between practice process and knowledge process, that is, in the state of unity of knowing and doing, how the process of knowledge with inter-subjectivity occurs. In order to answer this key question, this article first completes the practice knowledgelization, which regardingthe concrete practice as a process of "I" graspthe "concrete individual", which can produce a sense of direct reality. Then, taking this as the logical origin, a new classification system of knowledge is proposed, and the practicing of knowledge is also completed. In the new knowledge genealogies, practical knowledge is highlighted, which is really the dominant writing form of knowledge in China, and usually written in the structure of Chinese-style essays. Instead, explanatory knowledge has a higher intersubjectivity and is usually written in the norm of the so-called scientific paper. In the relationship between politics and knowledge in China, there exists a political system that facilitates the pursuit of unity between knowing and doing by policy-makers. The political system is also a social cognitive system with decision-makers as its core. Adapt to the interacting relationship between "core" and"edge" of the social cognitive system, different types of knowledge processes can find their own position.