文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：中·日和韩·日岛屿争端的比较研究及对我国的启示

英文题名：A Comparative Study on Island's Disputes between China-Japan vs.Korea-Japan and the Enlightenment for China

作者：任虎[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学法学院,上海200237

年份：2012

卷号：27

期号：5

起止页码：79

中文期刊名：华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition

收录：;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI2012_2013】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：钓鱼岛;独岛;国际法院;禁止反言

外文关键词：Diaoyu Islands, Dokdo Island, International Court of Justice, Estoppel

摘要：中国在中日钓鱼岛争端中一贯主张"搁置争议、共同开发"的和平解决方针,但日本不仅不接受,反而肆意控制中国固有主权的领土,藐视国际司法秩序。钓鱼岛和独岛争端的比较研究,揭露了日本国对领土争端中采取的矛盾立场,以及日本国领土主张之缺陷。树立"以其矛,克其盾"的战略,联合韩国等相关利益国家,通过国际法院解决钓鱼岛争端是中国解决钓鱼岛争端的首选途径。
China has a consistent position of ＂shelve disputes, common development＂ on Diaoyu islands dispute between China and Japan, and insists peaceful resolution. But Japan does not only accept it, but also expands its control to Chinese inherent sovereign territory, despising international judicial order. The comparative study between Diaoyu islands and Dokdo islands exposes the contradiction of Japan in the territorial dispute, as well as the defects of claim in the territorial arguments. It is the preferred way to solve the Diaoyu islands dispute through the international court by jointing with South Korea and other interest- related countries.