文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：城市与地方关系视角下的城乡融合发展

英文题名：Urban-rural Integration from the Perspective of Urban-locality Relation

作者：熊万胜[1,2,3];袁中华[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院,上海200237;[2]华东理工大学中国城乡发展研究中心,上海200237;[3]浙江红船干部学院社会发展与社会治理研究中心

年份：2021

期号：10

起止页码：55

中文期刊名：浙江社会科学

外文期刊名：Zhejiang Social Sciences

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;社科基金资助期刊;北大核心:【北大核心2020】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2021_2022】；

基金：国家社会科学基金青年项目“农村家庭结构权变及家庭政策创新研究”(18CSH031)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：城市与地方关系;城市地方体制;城乡关系紧密化;地方政府自主性;城乡融合发展

外文关键词：urban-locality relation;urban-locality system;tight urban-rural relation;local government autonomy;integrated urban-rural development

摘要：如何实现城乡融合发展是当代中国面临的一个重大命题。基于中国城市传统以及地方与城市关系的独特性,研究城乡融合发展问题必须注意到城市与地方之间的关系,而既有研究普遍忽视了这一视角。近代已降,尤其是改革开放以来,随着城镇化的快速推进,中国传统的地方与城市关系发生了重大变化,形成了城市地方体制和城乡关系紧密化的态势。结果是,地方政府在行政上服从于城市政府,地方社会系统服从于城市社会系统。在这种城市主导地方社会的城乡格局中,要实现城乡融合发展,就有一个如何发挥出地方政府相对于城市立场的自主性问题。而这需要地方政府找准政策平衡点,在城乡之间均衡分配发展权。在现阶段,如果说全局性的大城市中心主义一时难以撼动的话,走出市县内部的城区中心主义是一个可能的出路。
How to achieve integrated urban-rural development is a major proposition facing contemporary China.Based on China’s urban tradition and the uniqueness of urban-locality relation,research on integrated urban-rural development must pay attention to the urban-locality relation.After China started the process of modernization,especially since the reform and opening up,with the rapid advancement of urbanization,China’s traditional urban-locality relation has changed,forming a trend of urban-local systems and tight urban-rural relation.As a result,the local government is administratively subordinate to the urban government,and the local social system is subordinate to the urban social system.In this urban-rural structure in which cities dominate local society,to achieve integrated urban-rural development,the autonomy of the local government relative to the rural is raised.The local government need to find the policy balance point and distribute development convenience in a balanced way between urban and rural areas.At this stage,if the overall metropolitanism is difficult to shake for a while,it is a possible way out of urban centralism within cities and counties.