文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：犯罪定量刑法模式的比较与选择

英文题名：Comparison and Choice in the Mode of Criminal Law of the Ration of Crime

作者：张勇[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学法律系,上海200237

年份：2006

卷号：24

期号：5

起止页码：44

中文期刊名：河北法学

外文期刊名：Hebei Law Science

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2004】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2006_2007】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：犯罪定量;刑法模式;选择

外文关键词：the ration of crime ; the mode of criminal law; choice

摘要：中外刑法中有“立法定性、司法定量”和“立法既定性又定量”两种犯罪定量模式,两者各有利弊。但传统的法文化与现实法体系的冲突注定了在我国刑法典中对犯罪进行“立法定量”的合理性和现实性。只有将“立法定量”与“司法定量”协调统一起来,犯罪定量才会得以实现。
The essay probe into the idea and the mode of the ration of crime, analyzes China and foreign countries different crime quantitative modes, namely the foreign ones ＂legislation determines the nature, judicature fixes quantity ＂mode and our country ＂legislation determines the nature and quantity＂ mode, compares advantages and disadvantages of the two ration, and concludes the basic reasons of difference is the conflict in traditional law culture and realistic law systems, it destines the rationality and reality of ＂legislative ration＂ to the crime in our criminal law. The deviation question of the measurement of penalty exists generally in the judicial practice.