文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：论期待可能性在刑法中的表达与体系性地位——对刑法第十三条“但书”规定的另一种解读

英文题名：On the Expression and Systematic Status of Expectant Possibility in Criminal Law——An Interpretation of the Proviso of Article 13 in Chinese Criminal Law

作者：刘源[1,2]

机构：[1]华东理工大学法学院,上海200237;[2]华东政法大学法律学院,上海201620

年份：2010

卷号：12

期号：1

起止页码：72

中文期刊名：北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;CSSCI:【CSSCI2010_2011】；

语种：中文

中文关键词：期待可能性;表达;体系性地位;犯罪概念

外文关键词：expectant possibility; expression; systematic status; concept of crime

摘要：期待可能性的精神内核是"法律不能强人所难",这并非大陆法系所特有,我国刑法遵循并体现这一价值理念。要解答期待可能性在我国刑法中的表达和体系性地位的问题,需要选择性引进域外理论。期待可能性是一种出罪评价机制,属于超法规事由,它在我国刑法中的表达和体系性地位不能在犯罪构成体系中得到求解,刑法第十三条的"但书"规定"情节显著轻微且危害不大"包含了对期待可能性的表述,期待可能性是与犯罪构成体系并行的犯罪论中的内容。
The spirit of expectant possibility is that ＂Law can＇t force people＂. This is not only used in common law. Chinese Criminal Law adheres to and embodies this value idea. If we want to explain the expression and systematic status of expectant possibility in Chinese Criminal Law, we need to choose and introduce foreign theories. Expectant possibility is an evaluation system out of crime, and it＇s out of the legal causes. The expression and systematic status of expectant possibility in Chinese Criminal Law can＇t be explained in system of constitution of crime. The proviso of article 13 in Chinese Criminal Law says ＂The plot is significant slight and has little harm＂, this contains the expression of expectant possibility. Expectant possibility is a part in criminal theory, which is parallel to the system of constitution of crime.