文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：行政督查法治化的现实问题、理论依据及路径研究

英文题名：On Legalization of Administrative Supervision:Practical Issue,Theoretical Basis and Realization Path

作者：盖威[1];郭圣莉[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院

年份：2015

期号：2

起止页码：28

中文期刊名：中国行政管理

外文期刊名：Chinese Public Administration

收录：CSTPCD;;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2014】；社科基金资助期刊;CSSCI:【CSSCI2014_2016】；

基金：上海市重点学科建设项目(编号:B501);华东理工大学社会与公共管理学院"卓越计划与重点学科"项目

语种：中文

中文关键词：行政督查;内部行政行为;法治化

外文关键词：administrative supervision, Internal administrative action, Legalization

摘要：行政督查是内部行政行为,行政法的本质要求行政督查权要接受法律的规范与控制,现代控权理念要求行政督查组织法与行为法并行不悖、缺一不可,法治行政要求行政督查符合法律优先、法律保留、职权法定、依法行政、权责统一原则,行政自制理论要求行政机关自觉通过内部行政法规范和控制行政督查权。现行中国行政督查的依据、职能、主体、程序及法律责任没有满足上述要求,行政督查尚未实现法治化。探索一条符合中国实际的行政督查法治化的路径势在必行。
Administrative supervision is part of internal executive behavior. The essence of administrative law asks for the regulation and control of the power of administrative supervision. The modern controlling idea re- quires the Organization Act and Practices Act of administrative supervision to run parallel and indispensably. The administrative supervision under the rule of law should give law priority and retention, evaluate authority and execute according to law, and make the power and responsibility unified. The theory of ad- ministrative self--restraint requires administrative organs consciously control the power of administrative supervision through internal administrative laws. The basis, function, subject, procedure and legal liability of Chinese actual administrative supervision do not meet the requirements above. The administrative supervision has not been legalized yet. It is needed to exploring a practical path of administrative supervision based on the situation in China.