详细信息

三叶孔板换热器热力性能及其影响因素分析    

Investigation of the effects of structural parameters on the thermal performance of heat exchangers with trefoil-baffles

文献类型:期刊文献

中文题名:三叶孔板换热器热力性能及其影响因素分析

英文题名:Investigation of the effects of structural parameters on the thermal performance of heat exchangers with trefoil-baffles

作者:朱凌云[1];杨锦春[2];周帼彦[1];谭祥辉[1];郭震[1];朱辉[1];郎红方[2];朱冬生[1]

机构:[1]华东理工大学承压系统与安全教育部重点实验室,上海200237;[2]深圳中广核工程设计有限公司,广东深圳518031

年份:2014

卷号:33

期号:12

起止页码:3183

中文期刊名:化工进展

外文期刊名:Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress

收录:CSTPCD;;Scopus;北大核心:【北大核心2011】;CSCD:【CSCD2013_2014】;

语种:中文

中文关键词:三叶孔板;传热;计算流体动力学;影响因素;数值模拟

外文关键词:trefoil-baffle; heat transfer; computational fluid dynamics ( CFD ); influence factor;numerical simulation

摘要:建立了三叶孔板换热器壳程周期性全截面模型,利用商用软件Fluent14.0及RNG k-ε湍流模型对8种不同结构参数的换热器壳程流体流动及传热性能进行数值模拟。分析了支撑板间距、三叶孔孔高、导流筒结构形式等结构参数对三叶孔板换热器传热及阻力性能的影响,并对比不同结构换热器的综合换热性能。结果表明:壳程传热系数与压力梯度都分别随着支撑板间距和开孔高度的增加而减小,且支撑板间距和三叶孔孔高对三叶孔板换热器壳程压降的影响大于其对传热的影响;六边形结构的导流筒换热器换热性能优于圆形导流筒换热器;8种换热器模型中,支撑板间距400mm、三叶孔高3.3mm(模型4-2)的换热器综合性能最好,支撑板间距400mm、三叶孔高1.8mm(模型2-2)的换热器综合性能最差。
This research established a simplified periodic model for the flow and heat transfer on shell side of heat exchangers with trefoil-baffles. Based on the RNG k-εturbulence model,the flow and heat transfer characteristics on shell side were investigated by using commercial CFD software Fluent14.0 for 8 heat exchanger samples with different structural parameters. Effects of the structural parameters,including baffle pitch,trefoil-hole height and draft tube structure,on the performance of heat transfer and friction were analyzed. The results showed that the heat transfer coefficient and pressure gradient decreased when baffle pitch,as well as trefoil-hole height, increased. Baffle pitch and trefoil-hole height had larger influence on pressure drop than that on heat transfer coefficient. The heat exchanger with hexagon draft tube had better heat transfer performance than that with circle draft tube. The comprehensive performances were also evaluated. The Case 4-2 (Lb=400mm,H=3.3mm)was best and case 2-2(Lb=400mm,H=1.8mm)was worst among all heat exchangers with different structural parameters.

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

版权所有©华东理工大学 重庆维普资讯有限公司 渝B2-20050021-7 
渝公网安备 50019002500408号 违法和不良信息举报中心