文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：英汉语替代对比功能分析

英文题名：English and Chinese Substitution:A Contrastive Functional Analysis

作者：郑国锋[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学外国语学院,上海200237

年份：2009

卷号：24

期号：3

起止页码：95

中文期刊名：华东理工大学学报（社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of East China University of Science and Technology：Social Science Edition

收录：国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库

语种：中文

中文关键词：对比功能分析;替代

外文关键词：seontrastive functional analysis： substitution

摘要：Chesterman(1998)提出了对比功能分析,对指导具体的对比研究具有很大的实用价值。借助于这一分析框架,本文对比分析英汉两种语言在替代方面的异同。分析表明,两种语言内均存在一些语言形式替代已经或即将出现结构的中心成分,回指(anaphoric)为基本替代方向;一般替代形式不能单独使用,不可以省略,但两种语言的替代形式并非一对一的关系,表现在一些英语替代形式在汉语中没有对应的替代形式;一些汉语结构在英语中鲜见,比如条件替代的语尾词"的话"等。此外,总体分布上,英语替代使用广泛,汉语相对较少,翻译时往往需要借用其它衔接手段。
Contrastive functional analysis （CFA）, proposed by Chrsterman （1998）, is practically instrumental in specific contrastive analysis. The study, based on the CFA model, explores the similarity and dissimilarity in English and Chinese substitution. The analysis indicates that there are forms in both languages utilized as substitutes for the present constructions or constructions to appear, and mostly anaphoric in direction. What＇s more, the substitutes are dependent and not omissible. These similarities aside, the substitutes in both languages are not in one-to-one relationship, for example, some English forms finding no counterpart in Chinese and vice versa. Last but not least, distributionally, substitution is employed more frequently in English than in Chinese, which means that other cohesive devices will be put into use in translation.