文献类型：期刊文献

英文题名：The Influence of Emotion on Fairness-Related Decision Making: A Critical Review of Theories and Evidence

作者：Zheng, Ya[1];Yang, Zhong[2,3];Jin, Chunlan[4];Qi, Yue[2,3];Liu, Xun[2,3]

机构：[1]Dalian Med Univ, Dept Psychol, Dalian, Peoples R China;[2]Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, CAS Key Lab Behav Sci, Beijing, Peoples R China;[3]Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Dept Psychol, Beijing, Peoples R China;[4]East China Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Foreign Languages, Shanghai, Peoples R China

年份：2017

卷号：8

外文期刊名：FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY

收录：;WOS:【SSCI(收录号:WOS:000411055000001)】；

基金：This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 31571161, 31200782, 31500872, and 31640039), the China Scholarship Council, and the National Social Science Foundation of China (Grant 14ZDB161).

语种：英文

外文关键词：emotion; emotion regulation; fairness-related decision making; fairness theory; neural mechanisms

摘要：Fairness-related decision making is an important issue in the field of decision making. Traditional theories emphasize the roles of inequity aversion and reciprocity, whereas recent research increasingly shows that emotion plays a critical role in this type of decision making. In this review, we summarize the influences of three types of emotions (i.e., the integral emotion experienced at the time of decision making, the incidental emotion aroused by a task-unrelated dispositional or situational source, and the interaction of emotion and cognition) on fairness-related decision making. Specifically, we first introduce three dominant theories that describe how emotion may influence fairness-related decision making (i.e., the wounded pride/spite model, affect infusion model, and dual-process model). Next, we collect behavioral and neural evidence for and against these theories. Finally, we propose that future research on fairness-related decision making should focus on inducing incidental social emotion, avoiding irrelevant emotion when regulating, exploring the individual differences in emotional dispositions, and strengthening the ecological validity of the paradigm.