文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：全过程工程咨询团队间知识边界对知识融合意愿的影响

英文题名：Research on the Impact of Knowledge Boundaries among the Whole Process Engineering Consulting Teams on the Willingness of Knowledge Integration

作者：张宇彤[1];许佳骅[2];张苏娟[3];李亚迪[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学商学院,上海200237;[2]墨尔本大学工程与信息技术学院,澳大利亚墨尔本3053;[3]悉尼大学项目管理学院,澳大利亚悉尼2037

年份：2026

卷号：47

期号：4

起止页码：82

中文期刊名：建筑经济

外文期刊名：Construction Economy

基金：国家自然科学基金青年项目“多重嵌入视角下全过程工程咨询项目知识融合治理研究”(72301103);国家自然科学基金面上项目“面向ESG绩效的大型基础设施业主项目能力演化机理研究”(72471201);上海市白玉兰人才计划浦江项目“高质量发展导向下城市更新项目价值交付治理研究”(23PJC024)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：全过程工程咨询;知识边界;知识融合意愿;问卷调查;中介效应

外文关键词：whole-process engineering consulting;knowledge boundaries;knowledge integration willingness;questionnaire survey;mediating effect

摘要：全过程工程咨询作为知识密集型服务,其成果的交付需要不同专业咨询团队间的知识融合,但又不可避免地面临知识边界。基于知识边界理论,分析全过程工程咨询团队间多层级知识边界(语法、语义和语用边界)对知识融合意愿的影响,旨在促进咨询团队间知识融合。对179个全过程工程咨询项目问卷调查数据进行回归分析发现,语法边界对知识融合意愿影响不显著,语义边界和语用边界正向影响知识融合意愿。此外,语用边界在语义边界和知识融合意愿间起到部分中介作用。本研究丰富了全过程工程咨询领域关于知识边界和知识融合的理论,为实践管理提供参考。
As a knowledge-intensive service,whole-process engineering consulting urgently requires knowledge integration among specialty-specific consulting teams for delivering outcomes,yet it inevitably faces knowledge boundaries.Based on the knowledge boundary theory,this study analyzes the impact of multi-level knowledge boundaries(syntactic,semantic,pragmatic)on the willingness to integrate knowledge,aiming to promote knowledge integration.Regression analysis on questionnaire survey data from 179 whole-process engineering consulting projects reveals that syntactic boundaries have no significant impact on the willingness to integrate knowledge,while semantic boundaries and pragmatic boundaries positively affect it.Additionally,pragmatic boundaries play a partial mediating role between semantic boundaries and the willingness to integrate knowledge.This study enriches the theories related to knowledge boundaries and knowledge integration in the whole-process engineering consulting area,and provides useful implications for practical management.