文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：西方国家平等主义教育哲学的制衡机制探析

英文题名：Exploring the Check-and-Balance Mechanism of Equalitarianist Educational Philosophy in Western Countries

作者：潘艺林[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学高教所,上海200237

年份：2010

卷号：30

期号：2

起止页码：11

中文期刊名：教育理论与实践

外文期刊名：Theory and Practice of Education

收录：北大核心:【北大核心2008】；

基金：全国教育科学"十五"规划国家重点课题"转型期西方教育哲学的发展及其对我国的启示"研究成果之一;课题批准号:AAA1009

语种：中文

中文关键词：教育民主化;制衡;英才哲学;平等主义;教育质量

外文关键词：educational democracy; check-and-balance; elitism; equalitarianism; educational quality

摘要：民主必须解决各种力量的制衡问题,在西方高等教育民主化进程中,贵族哲学、英才哲学和平等主义三种力量此消彼涨,最终达到了较好的平衡,形成了平等主义与英才哲学双峰对峙的格局。这种局面包含着高等教育哲学的深刻转型:高等教育由少数人的特权变成了人人都可以享受的基本人权,而平等主义教育哲学本身,尽管深孚众望,却面对着来自贵族哲学的压力和英才哲学的阻力等阻抗因素,还有它无力化解的许多矛盾,特别是平等主义与教育公平的矛盾以及学生权益与教育质量的矛盾。
Democracy in education needs the check-and-balance mechanism. In the west, aristocratism, elitism and equalitarianism reached good balance in the democratization of higher education, which resulted in the situation where elitism and equalitarianism existed side by side. The situation embodies a profound shift of higher education philosophy： higher education has been turned into a fundamental pillar of human rights for all people instead of the privilege for the minority. At the same time, equalitarianism in higher education has to meet with the pressure from both aristocratism and elitism, and it also has to face some conflicts such as the contradiction between equalitarianism and educational equality, and the contradiction between student rights and educational quality.