文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：能源供给侧与消费侧碳排放的责任核算与驱动因素——基于“收入者责任”视角的考察

英文题名：Responsibility Accounting and Driving Factors for Carbon Emissions on Energy-Supply and Energy-Consumption Sides:An Examination from the Perspective of“Income Responsibility”

作者：邵帅[1];崔兴华[2]

机构：[1]华东理工大学商学院,上海200237;[2]江西财经大学经济学院,南昌330077

年份：2024

卷号：32

期号：1

起止页码：81

中文期刊名：上海交通大学学报（哲学社会科学版）

外文期刊名：Journal of Shanghai Jiao tong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

收录：;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2023】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2023_2024】；

基金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“推动能源供给侧与消费侧协同绿色发展促进人与自然和谐共生研究”(21ZDA084)。

语种：中文

中文关键词：能源供给侧与消费侧;收入者责任;碳排放;网络特征;驱动因素

外文关键词：energy-supply and energy-consumption sides;responsibility of income recipients;carbon emissions;network characteristics;driving factors

摘要：在大力推动“碳达峰、碳中和”的背景下,碳排放核算体系的科学性对碳减排责任界定的合理性至关重要。本文采用Ghosh投入产出模型,基于“收入者责任”视角对中国能源供给侧与消费侧省份的碳排放分别进行了核算和特征事实分析,并对其驱动因素进行了考察。结果显示:从时序变化趋势来看,“收入者责任”视角下能源供给侧和消费侧省份的碳排放均呈现出增长趋势;从动态演变情况来看,能源消费侧省份的碳排放分布呈现出明显的延展收敛趋势,而能源供给侧省份出现了微弱的梯度效应和分化效应;从责任差异来看,能源供给侧省份需要承担更多的碳排放责任;从行业集中度来看,能源消费侧省份产业部门碳排放的集中程度明显较低;从网络结构来看,“收入者责任”视角下碳排放网络总体上呈现“核心—边缘”特征;从驱动因素来看,规模效应是导致能源供给侧与消费侧碳排放增长的首要因素,而技术效应是降低能源供给侧与消费侧碳排放的关键驱动力。
In the context of vigorously promoting“carbon peak and carbon neutrality”,the scientificity of the carbon accounting system is crucial for the reasonable definition of carbon reduction responsibilities.This paper,employing the Ghosh input-output model,calculates and analyzes the carbon emissions in the provinces of the energy-supply side and those of the energy-consumption side in China from the perspective of“responsibility of income recipients”,and examines the driving factors behind these emissions.The results indicate that in terms of overall change,both provinces of the energy-supply side and energy-consumption side show an increase in carbon emissions from the perspective of“responsibility of income recipients”.Regarding dynamic evolution,carbon emissions in the provinces of energy-consumption side exhibit a significant tendency towards convergence,while those of energy-supply side show weak gradient and differentiation effects.In terms of responsibility differences,the provinces of energy-supply side bear a greater carbon emissions responsibility.In terms of industry intensity,carbon emissions from industrial sectors in the provinces of energy-consumption side are significantly less intensive.Regarding network structure,the carbon emissions network from the“responsibility of income recipients”perspective generally exhibits a“core-periphery”characteristic.Finally,in terms of driving factors,scale effect is the primary factor leading to the growth of carbon emissions in both the energy-supply and energy-consumption sides,while technological effect is the key driving force for reducing carbon emissions in these regions.