文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：论行政诱惑取证中的政府引诱行为及其监督——以美国法的客观理论为借镜

英文题名：On Governmental Temptation Behavior in Administrative Temptation Evidence Obtainment and Its Supervision——Drawing Lesson from Object Theory of American Law

作者：吴亮[1]

机构：[1]华东理工大学法学院

年份：2013

期号：3

起止页码：117

中文期刊名：行政法学研究

外文期刊名：ADMINISTRATIVE LAW REVIEW

收录：;国家哲学社会科学学术期刊数据库;北大核心:【北大核心2011】；CSSCI:【CSSCI2012_2013】；

基金：教育部人文社科基金青年项目"行政调查中的诱惑取证研究"(项目编号:12YJC820110)的成果

语种：中文

中文关键词：行政诱惑取证;违法引诱行为;客观标准说

外文关键词：Administrative Temptation Evidence Obtainment; Illegal Temptation Behavior; ObjectiveStandard Theory

摘要：在诱惑取证中,应当借鉴美国的客观标准说,注重规范政府的行为界限。行政调查取证有适用引诱行为之必要,可适用于调查具有连续性或者隐秘性的不法行为。但是引诱行为应遵守适当界限,如事前调查掌握行为人有可能违法的初步证据后,才能实施引诱;政府的引诱不得"蛮横",向公民施加过分压力。我国应严格约束引诱的适用范围,禁止"随机测试"的引诱方式,并排除以引诱行为作为前提的衍生证据。
In temptation evidence obtainment, lessons should be drawn from America＇s objective standard theory, which attach great importance to the regulation of governmental behavior boundaries. In administrative investigation evidence obtainment, the temptation behavior can be applied to investigate illegal actions with continuity or confidentiality. However, temptation behavior should abide by proper boundaries. For example, temptation can only be implemented after grasping the preliminary evidence that the doer may break the law through investigation in advance. Especially, the governmental temptation should not be ＂peremptory＂, i.e., government should not put excessive pressure on citizens. China should strictly bind the application range of temptation, forbidding the temptation method of ＇random testing＇ and removing the derivative evidence which takes temptation behavior as its premise.