文献类型：期刊文献

中文题名：《食品安全法》中惩罚性赔偿条款适用的实证分析

英文题名：Empirical Analysis on Application of Punitive Damages Clauses in Food Safety Law

作者：曹俊金[1];阮赞林[2]

机构：[1]华东政法大学经济法学院,上海200042;[2]华东理工大学法学院,上海200237

年份：2015

卷号：31

期号：2

起止页码：53

中文期刊名：天津法学

外文期刊名：Tianjin Legal Science

基金：上海高校青年教师培养资助计划"我国食品安全监管的困境与对策研究"资助项目;项目编号:shsd007

语种：中文

中文关键词：食品安全;食品安全法;民事责任;惩罚性赔偿

外文关键词：food safety; food safety law; civil responsibility; punitive damages

摘要：我国《食品安全法》及相关司法解释中确立的惩罚性赔偿制度过于原则性,给法律适用带来一定困难。食品安全民事案件没有规定专门的案由,导致目前立案案由差异较大的现状,应增加"食品安全责任纠纷"这一项新的案由,在食品惩罚性赔偿金诉讼中应对消费者的"生活消费"这一概念作扩大解释,并进一步明确"消费者"的范围,惩罚性赔偿金的适用应满足特定的责任主体、存在主观过错及实施不法行为这三个要件,损害后果并非消费者要求支付惩罚性赔偿金的构成要件,应在《食品安全法》中进一步完善食品惩罚性赔偿制度。
The system of punitive damages established in China＇s Food Safety Law and relevant judicial interpretations is so principled that it brings some difficulties to legal application. There isn＇t a specified cause of action in civil cases of food safety, which leads to the situation of great difference in cause of action. Food safety responsibility dispute should be added as a new cause of action. In food punitive damages litigation, the concept of ＂living consumption＂ for consumers should be interpreted broadly and the concept of ＂consumer＂ should be well defined. The application of punitive damages should meet three requirements, including specified liability subjects, subjective fault and implementation of illegal behavior. Resulted damage is not a constitutive requirement that consumers ask for paying punitive damages. Food Safety Law should be amended as soon as possible to improve the system of food punitive damages.